Re: whitelist_from not working

2008-10-29 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> >On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 07:52 -0700, John Hardin wrote: > >>I'm going to suggest again that, given how much pain it causes noobs, > >>perhaps the use of whitelist_from should generate a lint _warning_ that it > >>should only be used if no other whitelist method will work... > On Wed, 29 Oct 2008,

Re: whitelist_from not working

2008-10-29 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 11:15 -0700, John Hardin wrote: > On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > The thing with noobs and whitelist_from (according to my experience on > > this list) appears to be a lack of reading. I got the impression most of > > them just blindly whitelist_from the

Re: whitelist_from not working

2008-10-29 Thread John Hardin
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Karsten Br?ckelmann wrote: On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 07:52 -0700, John Hardin wrote: I'm going to suggest again that, given how much pain it causes noobs, perhaps the use of whitelist_from should generate a lint _warning_ that it should only be used if no other whitelist method

Re: whitelist_from not working

2008-10-29 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 07:52 -0700, John Hardin wrote: > I'm going to suggest again that, given how much pain it causes noobs, > perhaps the use of whitelist_from should generate a lint _warning_ that it > should only be used if no other whitelist method will work... The thing with noobs and whit

Re: whitelist_from not working

2008-10-29 Thread John Hardin
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Matt Kettler wrote: Benny Pedersen wrote: the more i hear about whitelist_from the more i want to make a bug on it, whitelist_from should imho newer have being implemented Agreed. whitelist_from sucks. However, it's there as a method of last-resort. There are some messa

Re: whitelist_from not working

2008-10-29 Thread Greg Troxel
Jeff Mincy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Agreed. whitelist_from sucks. However, it's there as a method of >last-resort. There are some messages you can't whitelist in SA using any >other method. (ie: when the sender's server doesn't have reverse DNS). > > Since whitelist_from is sp

Re: whitelist_from not working

2008-10-29 Thread Jeff Mincy
From: Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:24:25 -0400 Benny Pedersen wrote: > On Wed, October 29, 2008 10:18, Nelson Serafica wrote: > > >> Is this the right way to whitelist? As I check, when using 3.2.5, this is >> the right way of whitelistin

Re: whitelist_from not working

2008-10-29 Thread Henrik K
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 08:24:25AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote: > > There are some messages you can't whitelist in SA using any other method. > (ie: when the sender's server doesn't have reverse DNS). You can use trusted_networks + ALL_TRUSTED to whitelist. Given of course that there aren't any dyna

Re: whitelist_from not working

2008-10-29 Thread Matt Kettler
Benny Pedersen wrote: > On Wed, October 29, 2008 10:18, Nelson Serafica wrote: > > >> Is this the right way to whitelist? As I check, when using 3.2.5, this is >> the right way of whitelisting a domain. >> > > the more i hear about whitelist_from the more i want to make a bug on it, > white

Re: whitelist_from not working

2008-10-29 Thread Matt Kettler
Nelson Serafica wrote: > I'm using spamassassin 3.2.5. Now, I must a > whitelist_from containing [EMAIL PROTECTED] in my local.cf > . > > However, there are still 1 email that has been tagged as spam. In my > understanding, if a domain was in whitel

Re: whitelist_from not working

2008-10-29 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Wed, October 29, 2008 10:18, Nelson Serafica wrote: > Is this the right way to whitelist? As I check, when using 3.2.5, this is > the right way of whitelisting a domain. the more i hear about whitelist_from the more i want to make a bug on it, whitelist_from should imho newer have being imple

Re: whitelist_from not working

2008-10-29 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 29.10.08 17:18, Nelson Serafica wrote: > I'm using spamassassin 3.2.5. Now, I must a whitelist_from containing *@ > foo.com in my local.cf. > > However, there are still 1 email that has been tagged as spam. Only one? show the headers or upload it somewhere.. > In my understanding, if a domai

Re: whitelist_from not working with milter

2006-09-16 Thread Loren Wilton
BTW, some versions of spamass-milter have had problems with recent versions of SA. I don't know if that has been fixed or not, since I don't use it. It it hasn't been fixed (at least in the version you have) it may be part of your problem. Loren

Re: whitelist_from not working with milter

2006-09-16 Thread Matt Kettler
Rainer Sokoll wrote: > Hi, > > sendmail 8.13.7, Dan Nelson's spamss-milter 0.3.1, SA 3.1.5. > whitelist_from is ignored entirely, no matter if I put it into local.cf > or some other .cf. If I run SA in test mode (-t), SA honors > whitelist_from. > By digging into milter's source, I see this snipple

Re: whitelist_from not working, sometimes

2004-11-10 Thread hitete
I use : whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it works good. /Hitete

Re: whitelist_from not working, sometimes

2004-11-10 Thread Matt Kettler
At 10:53 AM 11/10/2004, Michael Weber wrote: I have a file, local-names.cf, in the /etc/mail/spamassassin directory which is a list of addresses I need to whitelist. It seems to work, except for one sender. Here is the line from the .cf file: whitelist_from LABONE.com This never trigger