> >On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 07:52 -0700, John Hardin wrote: > >>I'm going to suggest again that, given how much pain it causes noobs, > >>perhaps the use of whitelist_from should generate a lint _warning_ that it > >>should only be used if no other whitelist method will work...
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Karsten Br�ckelmann wrote: > >The thing with noobs and whitelist_from (according to my experience on > >this list) appears to be a lack of reading. I got the impression most of > >them just blindly whitelist_from their own domain to be on the safe > >side, without any prior investigation and usually without any need. On 29.10.08 11:15, John Hardin wrote: > Agreed, and if they aren't reading the documentation carefully enough to > see the warnings about using whitelist_from, then they probably aren't > running a lint either... > > However, if emitting a warning in lint saves having some "why are spams > hitting USER_IN_WHITELIST??" messages sent to the list, it's probably > worth doing. Actually, it's completely safe to whitelist some domains, if your MTA does the SPF check for you, and you expect no fails to pass fotr those domains... -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. There's a long-standing bug relating to the x86 architecture that allows you to install Windows. -- Matthew D. Fuller
