On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Mike Loiterman wrote:
I periodically get these errors in my log and when I do the messages are not
scanned.
What's going on and how do I stop it?
This isn't an SA issue. It has to do with how your MTA deals with your
LDA (probably procmail)
Make sure that the LDA doesn't genera
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 01:17:55PM -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> Hrmmm, a good feature in a future version would be the ability to grow
> this number dynamically up to some hard-and-fast high limit.
Yeah. The first step was going from the previous "fork() per incoming
message" model
On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 12:17, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> Hrmmm, a good feature in a future version would be the ability to grow
> this number dynamically up to some hard-and-fast high limit.
This is the way that I am seeing mimedefang-multiplexor work. Have you
looked at MIMEDefang?
Ale
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 12:55:44PM -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Additionally, Im seeing PAGES of spamc when I do a ps aux|grep spam:
That can definitely happen if you don't have enough spamd processes for
the number of requests (or if the spamd
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 12:55:44PM -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> Additionally, Im seeing PAGES of spamc when I do a ps aux|grep spam:
That can definitely happen if you don't have enough spamd processes for
the number of requests (or if the spamd processes running are all doing
somethin
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
More on this:
I'm seeing an oddness in that each message seemingly has two procmail
processes atached to it (snippets from ps aux):
kimry 2543 0.0 0.1 1208 832 ?? I12:50PM 0:00.00
procmail -f [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Y -a kimm
