On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 01:17:55PM -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: > Hrmmm, a good feature in a future version would be the ability to grow > this number dynamically up to some hard-and-fast high limit.
Yeah. The first step was going from the previous "fork() per incoming
message" model to the 3.0 "pre-fork() children" model. I was thinking
about emulating the httpd method of prefork, dynamically spawn/kill,
etc, but that was a bit much to bite off for 3.0.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"See, that's the advantage of running OS/2 ... Viruses don't support it."
- Theo talking to Rob
pgpSOZ4TeVAIC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
