Re: Testing Spamminess of Own Mail

Jerry Malcolm skrev den 2017-09-20 17:32: I didn't "misguide" anyone.  Even if you can't think of a reason to use it or don't want to use it, then don't use it.  There's no reason to disparage the service.  It found all kinds of problems with my email.  I fixed them.  I haven't had any problems s

Re: Testing Spamminess of Own Mail

On 09/20/2017 09:51 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote: RW skrev den 2017-01-11 16:11: Try mail-tester.com it have badly working MX checks, MX rr is only needed if mailserver is diffrent ip then A/ records, i wont trust it as long this error is there While it may be technically true in an RFC

Re: Testing Spamminess of Own Mail

I didn't "misguide" anyone.  Even if you can't think of a reason to use it or don't want to use it, then don't use it.  There's no reason to disparage the service.  It found all kinds of problems with my email.  I fixed them.  I haven't had any problems since. Don't misguide people! On 9/20/

Re: Testing Spamminess of Own Mail

RW skrev den 2017-01-11 16:11: Try mail-tester.com it have badly working MX checks, MX rr is only needed if mailserver is diffrent ip then A/ records, i wont trust it as long this error is there and why use a mail-tester if it gets URIBL_BLOCKED its silly dont missguide people

Re: Testing Spamminess of Own Mail

On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Antony Stone wrote: > On Wednesday 11 January 2017 at 16:22:13, Michael B Allen wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Antony Stone wrote: >> > On Wednesday 11 January 2017 at 15:57:20, Michael B Allen wrote: >> >> Is it possible to send a message to myself

Re: Testing Spamminess of Own Mail

On Wednesday 11 January 2017 at 16:22:13, Michael B Allen wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Antony Stone wrote: > > On Wednesday 11 January 2017 at 15:57:20, Michael B Allen wrote: > >> Is it possible to send a message to myself to see what SA thinks of my > >> mail rig? > >> > >> If I j

Re: Testing Spamminess of Own Mail

On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Antony Stone wrote: > On Wednesday 11 January 2017 at 15:57:20, Michael B Allen wrote: > >> Is it possible to send a message to myself to see what SA thinks of my mail >> rig? > >> If I just send a message from one account to another, of course it >> never leaves

Re: Testing Spamminess of Own Mail

On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 09:57:20 -0500 Michael B Allen wrote: > Is it possible to send a message to myself to see what SA thinks of > my mail rig? > > I'm using CentOS 7.2, spamassassin 3.4.0 and postfix 2.10 and running > spamd + spamc in postfix master.cf > sendmail > procmail > .Spam > folder. >

Re: Testing Spamminess of Own Mail

On Wed, 11 Jan 2017, Michael B Allen wrote: Is it possible to send a message to myself to see what SA thinks of my mail rig? I'm using CentOS 7.2, spamassassin 3.4.0 and postfix 2.10 and running spamd + spamc in postfix master.cf > sendmail > procmail > .Spam folder. If I just send a message f

Re: Testing Spamminess of Own Mail

On Wednesday 11 January 2017 at 15:57:20, Michael B Allen wrote: > Is it possible to send a message to myself to see what SA thinks of my mail > rig? > If I just send a message from one account to another, of course it > never leaves the server and thus dodges SA. Is there a clever way to > tempo

Re: Testing SPF & DKIM configurations

You can try https://validator.messagesystems.com It does require registration, but you get some pretty detailed information back. ~ Matt Vernhout @emailkarma http://emailkarma.net Please excuse any typos or short forms, sent from my iPhone > On May 20, 2015, at 20:20, Philip Prindeville > w

Re: Testing SPF & DKIM configurations

Philip Prindeville skrev den 2015-05-21 02:20: Anyone know of a site that you can send an email to in order to test your SPF and/or DKIM configuration? https://dmarcian.com/ I’ve set it up but every once in a while I get back weird messages about being blocked from certain sites and I’m wonde

Re: Testing SPF & DKIM configurations

On 5/20/2015 8:20 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: Anyone know of a site that you can send an email to in order to test your SPF and/or DKIM configuration? I’ve set it up but every once in a while I get back weird messages about being blocked from certain sites and I’m wondering if something is w

Re: Testing 123...

Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2015-05-02 05:10: Test of the list. spf helo test

Re: testing

On 1/30/2015 6:25 PM, Marc Perkel wrote: just checking. My email doesn't seem to be posting. Appears to be on ASF's side of things. Lots of email coming through all the sudden. Regards, KAM

Re: testing

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 It is ;-) >just checking. My email doesn't seem to be posting. - -- CHUNKZ.NET - dodgy DIYer and computer technician Bertrand Caplet, Flers (FR) Feel free to send encrypted/signed messages Key ID: FF395BD9 GPG FP: DE10 73FD 17EB 5544 A491 B385 1ED

Re: Testing SpamAssassin

gayle...@eircom.net schrieb am 13. Mai 2014 um 12:56 +0200: >When I send email from my laptop (using KMail) >containing the string in the above URL, >I simply get a message saying >- >Failed to transport message. >The message content was not accepted. >The server responded: "M

Re: Testing SpamAssassin

On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 11:38 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: > [tim@grover ~]$ sa-learn --dump magic > > 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version > 0.000 0 25758 0 non-token data: nspam > 0.000 0 36434 0 non-token data: nham > 0.000 0 144860 0 non-token data: ntokens That s

Re: Testing SpamAssassin

On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 11:33 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: > I'm not sure if SA is working properly on my CentOS-6.5 server. > :0fw:spamassassin.lock > * < 256000 > | /usr/bin/spamc This adds some X-Spam headers to all messages less than 256 kByte in size, both spam and ham. The headers include det

Re: Testing SpamAssassin

> On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 12:56:45 AM Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: On the server run the following command as user tim, to get some details about number of messages learned and if it has been learned recently. sa-learn --dump magic Thanks again for your response. I get the following: --

Re: Testing SpamAssassin

On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 12:22 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: > On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 12:56:45 AM Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > Thanks for your response. > I think my problem lies with sa-learn, not with SpamAssassin itself. On the server run the following command as user tim, to get some details ab

Re: Testing SpamAssassin

On 5/13/2014 6:56 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: On Monday, May 12, 2014 11:13:53 AM Bowie Bailey wrote: > Send a gtube message to one of your email addresses. If SA is working > properly, it should be delivered to your spam folder. > > http://spamassassin.apache.org/gtube/ I'm sorry, I have no

Re: Testing SpamAssassin

On Monday, May 12, 2014 11:13:53 AM Bowie Bailey wrote: > Send a gtube message to one of your email addresses. If SA is working > properly, it should be delivered to your spam folder. > > http://spamassassin.apache.org/gtube/ I'm sorry, I have no idea what this test does, or is supposed to do.

Re: Testing SpamAssassin

On Tue, 13 May 2014, Timothy Murphy wrote: On Monday, May 12, 2014 11:13:53 AM Bowie Bailey wrote: Send a gtube message to one of your email addresses. If SA is working properly, it should be delivered to your spam folder. http://spamassassin.apache.org/gtube/ I'm sorry, I have no idea wha

Re: Testing SpamAssassin

On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 12:56:45 AM Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:> On Mon, > > I'm not sure if SA is working properly on my CentOS-6.5 server. > > > But how can I check that SA is working properly? > > Your question is slightly confusing. Does spam get delivered to your > dedicated spam maildir?

Re: Testing SpamAssassin

On 5/12/2014 6:33 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: I'm not sure if SA is working properly on my CentOS-6.5 server. I've a rather old setup on the machine, not using postfix, but running dovecot to read the mail on laptop or android. I collect email with fetchmail from various servers. My .procmailr

Re: Testing SpamAssassin

gayle...@eircom.net schrieb am 12. Mai 2014 um 12:33 +0200: >But how can I check that SA is working properly? Spamassassin and ClamAV for that matter have Test Signatures you can use to test the setup. For Spamassasin see http://spamassassin.apache.org/gtube/ kind regards, Toni Schornboeck

Re: Testing SpamAssassin

On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 11:33 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Any and all advice or suggestions gratefully received, > including pointers to helpful documentation. > I use a similar mail collection chain to your remote set-up except that: - I use getmail rather than fetchmail to collect email from m

Re: Testing the _REMOTEHOSTNAME_ in a rule

On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 13:19 -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote: > On Oct 19, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann > wrote: > > RULE_NAME X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted =~ /^[^\]]+ rdns=evil.example.net / > > > > That rdns value is added to the Received header by your SMTP, and your > > MX actually sh

Re: Testing the _REMOTEHOSTNAME_ in a rule

On Oct 19, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 18:34 -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote: >> I'm trying to write a rule that gives some spamminess score to messages >> received from any host that resolves to protection.outlook.com. >> >> I tried to use _REMOTEHOSTNA

Re: Testing the _REMOTEHOSTNAME_ in a rule

On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 18:34 -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote: > I'm trying to write a rule that gives some spamminess score to messages > received from any host that resolves to protection.outlook.com. > > I tried to use _REMOTEHOSTNAME_ to do this, but I think I got the > header syntax wrong. Tem

Re: Testing Valid Recipients for outbound spam filtering

On 5/1/2013 12:12 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote: Am 01.05.2013 08:17, schrieb Marc Perkel: Looking for tricks. I'm working on improving outbound spam filtering and I'm using Exim and testing for valid recipients doing forward recipient callouts, which I would like to reduce. I'm wondering if th

Re: Testing Valid Recipients for outbound spam filtering

On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 23:17:42 -0700 Marc Perkel wrote: > Or - open to any suggestions on blocking outbound spam. (I'm > filtering outbound for customers so I don't control the original > servers) We use quarantining (although at a higher score than for inbound mail) and rate-limiting (a given sen

Re: Testing Valid Recipients for outbound spam filtering

Am 01.05.2013 08:17, schrieb Marc Perkel: > Looking for tricks. > > I'm working on improving outbound spam filtering and I'm using Exim and > testing for valid recipients doing forward recipient callouts, which I > would like to reduce. > > I'm wondering if there's any tricks to figure out at lea

Re: Testing Valid Recipients for outbound spam filtering

Marc Perkel skrev den 2013-05-01 08:17: Or - open to any suggestions on blocking outbound spam. (I'm filtering outbound for customers so I don't control the original servers) block sender domains with spf that try to send from the incorrect ip, pypolicyd-spf rooks there, just remember not to

Re: Testing new install - was Updating 3.2.4 on SUSE sles10

> I suggest you contact your ISP and ask whether they are doing anything > that would discard GTUBE messages. > > -- > John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ > jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org Sad, but likely true. joe a

Re: Testing new install - was Updating 3.2.4 on SUSE sles10

On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 19:23 -0400, Joseph Acquisto wrote: > >>> On 10/15/2012 at 3:46 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 14:02 -0400, Joseph Acquisto wrote: > >> Still can't get GTUBE messages. Am I being dense? Sending messages > >> with the GTUBE "signature", > >> from exte

Re: Testing new install - was Updating 3.2.4 on SUSE sles10

On Mon, 15 Oct 2012, Joseph Acquisto wrote: On 10/15/2012 at 3:46 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote: On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 14:02 -0400, Joseph Acquisto wrote: Still can't get GTUBE messages. Am I being dense? Sending messages with the GTUBE "signature", from external sites, don't seem to arrive. I

Re: Testing new install - was Updating 3.2.4 on SUSE sles10

>>> On 10/15/2012 at 2:36 PM, wrote: > Try sending it from the server you're testing? > spamassassin -D < gtube.txt Seems to put out a lot of text to screen. joe a.

Re: Testing new install - was Updating 3.2.4 on SUSE sles10

>>> On 10/15/2012 at 3:46 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote: > On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 14:02 -0400, Joseph Acquisto wrote: >> Still can't get GTUBE messages. Am I being dense? Sending messages >> with the GTUBE "signature", >> from external sites, don't seem to arrive. I don't see them trapped >> in m

Re: Testing new install - was Updating 3.2.4 on SUSE sles10

15.10.2012 21:02, Joseph Acquisto kirjoitti: > Still can't get GTUBE messages. Am I being dense? Sending messages with > the GTUBE "signature", > from external sites, don't seem to arrive. I don't see them trapped in my > day jobs outgoing > queue, etc. > Maybe the server (you used to send

Re: Testing new install - was Updating 3.2.4 on SUSE sles10

On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 14:02 -0400, Joseph Acquisto wrote: > Still can't get GTUBE messages. Am I being dense? Sending messages > with the GTUBE "signature", > from external sites, don't seem to arrive. I don't see them trapped > in my day jobs outgoing > queue, etc. > Is there any sign of t

Re: Testing new install - was Updating 3.2.4 on SUSE sles10

I can try that, this evening. Thought that was expressly warned against. Did I mis-read? joe a. >>> 10/15/12 2:37 PM >>> Try sending it from the server you're testing? On 10/15, Joseph Acquisto wrote: > Still can't get GTUBE messages. Am I being dense? Sending messages with > the GTUBE

Re: Testing new install - was Updating 3.2.4 on SUSE sles10

Try sending it from the server you're testing? On 10/15, Joseph Acquisto wrote: > Still can't get GTUBE messages. Am I being dense? Sending messages with > the GTUBE "signature", > from external sites, don't seem to arrive. I don't see them trapped in my > day jobs outgoing > queue, etc.

Re: Testing new install - was Updating 3.2.4 on SUSE sles10

Still can't get GTUBE messages. Am I being dense? Sending messages with the GTUBE "signature", from external sites, don't seem to arrive. I don't see them trapped in my day jobs outgoing queue, etc. ?? joe a. >>> "Joseph Acquisto" 10/14/12 5:50 PM >>> Upgrade effort abandoned. Install

Re: Testing new install - was Updating 3.2.4 on SUSE sles10

>>> On 10/14/2012 at 6:25 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > 15.10.2012 00:48, Joseph Acquisto kirjoitti: >> Upgrade effort abandoned. Installed OpenSuse 12.2 which, oddly enough, came > with the new version of >> SA. All seems to be working well. OS seems a big leisurely though. >> >> However, I

Re: Testing new install - was Updating 3.2.4 on SUSE sles10

15.10.2012 00:48, Joseph Acquisto kirjoitti: > Upgrade effort abandoned. Installed OpenSuse 12.2 which, oddly enough, came > with the new version of > SA. All seems to be working well. OS seems a big leisurely though. > > However, I can't seem to test with GTUBE. Gmail seems to eat these, t

Re: Testing Needed: spamassassin-3.3.2-rc1

Andreas Schulze wrote: > the perldoc in some files is minimalistic :-) > But sometimes the perldoc produces mangages with errors: > - lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/OneLineBodyRuleType.pm > - lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util/DependencyInfo.pm > - lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util/RegistrarBoundaries.pm > Attached

Re: Testing Needed: spamassassin-3.3.2-rc1

Please file bugs. Nothing can be committed to spamassassin-3.3.x without bugs and votes. Warren

Re: Testing Needed: spamassassin-3.3.2-rc1

Am 15.05.2011 22:29 schrieb Andreas Schulze: > But sometimes the perldoc produces mangages with errors: and some other manpages changes ... Attached my other patch. Andreas -- # # Andreas Schulze # https://andreasschulze.de

Re: Testing Needed: spamassassin-3.3.2-rc1

Am 14.05.2011 22:34 schrieb Warren Togami Jr.: Warren, > It would be helpful for folks to test it and provide feedback. the perldoc in some files is minimalistic :-) But sometimes the perldoc produces mangages with errors: - lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/OneLineBodyRuleType.pm - lib/Mail/SpamAssa

Re: Testing new server

On 03/04/11 22:04, Alex wrote: Hi all, I've just installed a new server using fedora14 with spamassassin, amavisd, postfix, and dovecot. I've configured it the same to the best of my ability as an existing server currently in production that I would like to replace with this new system. This is

Re: Testing new server

On 04/03, Alex wrote: > How can I either use the existing system or emails stored on the > current system to test the new system before putting it into > production? The best option may be to create a temporary DNS MX Record pointing to the new server, and just send mail to it. If normal mail get

Re: testing spamassassin,sa-learn not work

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Khanh Truong wrote: I created a sample message, then tell spamassassin to learn it as spam with the command #sa-learn --spam spamtest.txt then I tried the command #spamc < spamtest.txt but spamassassin still scored it as non-spam. Am I doing something wrong? Please help!

Re: Testing service

Benny Pedersen wrote: > On Tue, February 24, 2009 16:07, Claude Schneegans wrote: > >> I'd like to know if there exists some service to which I could send >> a sample of a newsletter and that will return what Spamassassin >> has found not correct in the mail, in order to make sure all my >> subs

Re: Testing service

On Tue, February 24, 2009 16:07, Claude Schneegans wrote: > I'd like to know if there exists some service to which I could send > a sample of a newsletter and that will return what Spamassassin > has found not correct in the mail, in order to make sure all my > subscribers will receive it. spamas

Re: Testing service

Claude Schneegans wrote: Hi, I'd like to know if there exists some service to which I could send a sample of a newsletter and that will return what Spamassassin has found not correct in the mail, in order to make sure all my subscribers will receive it. Claude: the nature of SA, and SA insta

RE: testing spam gives warn config error

mouss wrote: > Kate Kleinschafer wrote: > > I am almost 100% certain that I need to be able to run this command > > as postfix. > > > > then find out how to override root environment. try: > sudo postfix HOME=/var/spool/postfix spamassassin ... or, more simply, try this: sudo -u postfix -H spa

Re: testing spam gives warn config error

Kate Kleinschafer wrote: I am almost 100% certain that I need to be able to run this command as postfix. then find out how to override root environment. try: sudo postfix HOME=/var/spool/postfix spamassassin ...

Re: testing spam gives warn config error

I am almost 100% certain that I need to be able to run this command as postfix. Kate mouss wrote: Kate Kleinschafer wrote: I don't think I want to run it as root do I? run the test command as root, not mailscanner. you have the error while running the test command. you don't have an error

Re: testing spam gives warn config error

Kate Kleinschafer wrote: I don't think I want to run it as root do I? run the test command as root, not mailscanner. you have the error while running the test command. you don't have an error while running mailscanner. (MailScanner is set to use user postfix) I Don't use MS so I have no

Re: testing spam gives warn config error

I don't think I want to run it as root do I? (MailScanner is set to use user postfix) Which config file sets it to use /root/ directory? Thanks Kate mouss wrote: Kate Kleinschafer wrote: Hi all, I have a new install of MailScanner / Postfix / Spamassassin when I run sudo -u postfix spamassa

Re: testing spam gives warn config error

Kate Kleinschafer wrote: Hi all, I have a new install of MailScanner / Postfix / Spamassassin when I run sudo -u postfix spamassassin -p /etc/MailScanner/spam.assassin.prefs.conf -t < message.MAI I get the following error: warn config path /root/ .spamassassin is inaccessible permission denied

Re: Testing for existence of header

Michael Scheidell wrote: From: Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:34:05 -0700 To: SpamAssassin Users List Subject: Testing for existence of header Shows how to test for text associated with a header. How do I test if

Re: Testing for existence of header

> From: Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:34:05 -0700 > To: SpamAssassin Users List > Subject: Testing for existence of header > > > > Shows how to test for text associated with a header. How do I test if the > head

Re: Testing DNSRBLs using SA

DAve wrote: D Hill wrote: To me that rule looks fine. Perhaps your testing is completely within your trusted path? Feed the message with SpamAssassin with the -D debug switch to see for sure. That is how I have been testing it. spamassassin -D < test-mail 2>&1 | grep invaluement No joy, no

Re: Testing DNSRBLs using SA

D Hill wrote: On Fri, 23 May 2008 at 10:32 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated: Good morning all, I am trying to use SA to test a DNSBL and I am not having any luck getting the rule to hit. I've looked through 20_dnsbl_tests.cf, and read the appropriate section in the docs. http://spamas

Re: Testing DNSRBLs using SA

Rob McEwen wrote: DAve wrote: I am trying to use SA to test a DNSBL PLEASE--note that direct queries to the invaluement.com DNSBLs will *always* fail. These are *only* available via RSYNC. So please don't try to add SIP to your RBL list... it won't work!!! (Dave knows this... I'm just men

RE: Testing DNSRBLs using SA

> > I am trying to use SA to test a DNSBL and I am not having any luck > getting the rule to hit. I've looked through 20_dnsbl_tests.cf, and read > the appropriate section in the docs. > > http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html# > rule_definitions_and_privileged

Re: Testing DNSRBLs using SA

DAve wrote: I am trying to use SA to test a DNSBL PLEASE--note that direct queries to the invaluement.com DNSBLs will *always* fail. These are *only* available via RSYNC. So please don't try to add SIP to your RBL list... it won't work!!! (Dave knows this... I'm just mentioning this for ot

Re: Testing DNSRBLs using SA

On Fri, 23 May 2008 at 10:32 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated: Good morning all, I am trying to use SA to test a DNSBL and I am not having any luck getting the rule to hit. I've looked through 20_dnsbl_tests.cf, and read the appropriate section in the docs. http://spamassassin.apache.o

Re: Testing MD5-Sum of the Subject against a dnsbl

Benny Pedersen wrote: That is a good starting point for writing a plugin to do something similar but the OP wants to hash the subject not the body. subject is part of the body Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that ixhash splits the part after the blank line (body) and hashes it u

Re: Testing MD5-Sum of the Subject against a dnsbl

>>> Is there a way to realise this in SA. >> http://ixhash.sourceforge.net/ > That is a good starting point for writing a plugin to do something > similar but the OP wants to hash the subject not the body. subject is part of the body > I started doing this a while ago in addition to using ixhash

Re: Testing MD5-Sum of the Subject against a dnsbl

Oops, still trying to get used to Thunderbird and didn't post this to the list Benny Pedersen wrote: Is there a way to realise this in SA. http://ixhash.sourceforge.net/ That is a good starting point for writing a plugin to do something similar but the OP wants to hash the subject no

Re: Testing MD5-Sum of the Subject against a dnsbl

> Is there a way to realise this in SA. http://ixhash.sourceforge.net/

Disabling eval rules (was: Re: Testing Botnet)

On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 12:23 -0800, Robert - elists wrote: > > Sounds like you've been hit by bug 5519 [1] before the upgrade in Oct. > > Setting rules scores to 0 did *not* prevent these tests from being > > evaluated for SA 3.2.x before 3.2.3. > > > > Fixed since 3.2.3. Plugin eval rules with 0

RE: Testing Botnet

> > Sounds like you've been hit by bug 5519 [1] before the upgrade in Oct. > Setting rules scores to 0 did *not* prevent these tests from being > evaluated for SA 3.2.x before 3.2.3. > > Fixed since 3.2.3. Plugin eval rules with 0 scores are meant no not be > evaluated, and of course to not sho

Re: Testing Botnet

On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 18:03 +, Arthur Dent wrote: > Hello All, > > I'm afraid that I might have wasted your time - Hence the change to the thread > Subject. > > I guess that what triggered my original question was the fact that I was > trying to check that everything was working following an

Re: Testing with My Yahoo Account Spams

mozafar rowshan schrieb: Hi friends! I've installed SpamAssassin 3.2.3 in CentOS 5, now for testing purposes. I've checked SA (spamc/d) and It works for package spam and non-spam sample files. As far as I remember, I did not play with SA settings, so the configuration is default. An

Re: Testing the Subject header - decoded?

Loren Wilton wrote: > I believe ot should work the way you want it to as you have it. If > you wanted to look at the undecoded mime you would do > Subject:raw =~ /something/ Thanks Loren - I realised just that after having dug a little deeper. /Per Jessen, Zürich

Re: Testing the Subject header - decoded?

How do I write a rule for the subject header, but for working on the mimedecoded contents? For instance a simple rule to check the length of the subject: header BW_SUBJECT_LONG Subject =~ /.{100}/ Problem is - when the subject has been mime-encoded, it's already very long: Subject: =?iso-8859-

Re: Testing the Subject header - decoded?

Per Jessen wrote: > How do I write a rule for the subject header, but for working on the > mimedecoded contents? > Sorry, just found the answer. Ignore me. /Per Jessen, Zürich

Re: Testing Bayes filters

On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 01:41 +0200, Alex Woick wrote: > My bayes and awl tables were created according to the manual, but I > added a timestamp column to the awl table and to the bayes_seen table to > be able to expire them by date. I've added these fields, with "default=CURRENT_TIMESTAMP". When

Re: Testing Bayes filters

I saw a number of posts on this list earlier indicating that Bayesian filter learning and/or application of learned information wasn't working properly if the Bayesian analysis data were stored in a MySQL database What's the status of this bug, if it is one, or if it's a misconfiguration issue,

RE: Testing Spamassassin with the mail command

StarkRavingCalm wrote: > Bowie, > Thank you for the reply. What I would like to do is to test it by > letting it pass thru so I can see how it would arrive in the user's > inbox. Then configure the MTA to accept and deliver mail for a test user and send him some mail. You can send the mail eithe

RE: Testing Spamassassin with the mail command

. This way I can tweak it if I need to. Ultimately using the mail command would be best. Rich -Original Message- From: Vincent Fleming [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 1:54 PM To: StarkRavingCalm; Subject: RE: Testing Spamassassin with the mail command OK Everyone

RE: Testing Spamassassin with the mail command

OK Everyone - Send him your SPAM!!! ;-) Just kidding... I'm not sure what you're looking for from us. Please be more specific. By the way, I use Sendmail as well, and find the spamass-milter to be a great way to link in spamassassin. Also, the blacklists are very effective. If you need any a

RE: Testing Spamassassin with the mail command

Bowie, Thank you for the reply. What I would like to do is to test it by letting it pass thru so I can see how it would arrive in the user's inbox. Thanks Bowie Bailey wrote: > > StarkRavingCalm wrote: >> Hello. >> I am new to SpamAssasin. I have configured my new Sendmail server to >> use

RE: Testing Spamassassin with the mail command

StarkRavingCalm wrote: > Hello. > I am new to SpamAssasin. I have configured my new Sendmail server to > use Spamassassin and have tested with the usual commands: > spamassassin -D < /usr/share/doc/spamassassin-3.1.8/sample-spam.txt > > I want to test how the messages will look when delivered, so

Re: Testing whitelist

On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 04:14:41PM +0100, Beginner wrote: > That sounds reasonable. I'll create a file (whitelist.cf) for > manually whitelisting senders. Am I right in thinking that I will > need to HUP SA after each edit? Yes. > provides. The would also have the same security problem with thi

Re: Testing whitelist

On 13 Sep 2006 at 10:50, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > If you want something specifically always whitelisted, yes, it needs > a whitelist_* config somewhere. If user prefs are disabled, it would > need to be in a site-wide config file, though not necessarily local.cf > (*.cf is fine). That sounds rea

Re: Testing whitelist

On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 03:42:12PM +0100, Dermot Paikkos wrote: > Does that mean the only way to whitelist senders is manually via the > local.cf as I have disabled user_prefers? If so, what would be the If you want something specifically always whitelisted, yes, it needs a whitelist_* config so

Re: Testing whitelist

On 13 Sep 2006 at 10:21, Matt Kettler wrote: > Beginner wrote: > > > I hope that 3.0.3 version is the one that Debian patched to fix the > two security holes that exist in the original 3.0.3. (AFAIK Debian did > backport the fixes, and made a 3.0.3-x release) > > See: http://wiki.apache.org/spa

Re: Testing whitelist

Beginner wrote: > Hi, > > === SyS Stuff > SpamAssassin version 3.0.3 > running on Perl version 5.8.4 > > Exim 4.2, on Debian 3.1, sitewide config. > I hope that 3.0.3 version is the one that Debian patched to fix the two security holes that exist in the original 3.0.3. (AFAIK Debian d

Re: testing for empty text/plain

On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 09:11:14AM -0400, Eric A. Hall wrote: > What's the most efficient way to grab the text/plain part? Check out the other code/plugins. Getting to a specific message part is pretty easy. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit,

Re: testing for empty text/plain

On 8/7/2006 12:25 AM, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 12:07:58AM -0400, Eric A. Hall wrote: >> Anybody written a rule that tests for empty text/plain, preferably only >> when a non-empty text/html or some other media-type is provided? > > Sounds very similar to MPART_ALT_DIFF. T

Re: testing for empty text/plain

On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 12:07:58AM -0400, Eric A. Hall wrote: > Anybody written a rule that tests for empty text/plain, preferably only > when a non-empty text/html or some other media-type is provided? Sounds very similar to MPART_ALT_DIFF. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "Deja Fu: The feeling t

RE: Testing for short message?

> -Original Message- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 11:54 PM > To: Mark R. London; users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Testing for short message? > > At 08:47 AM 12/25/2005, Mark R. London wrote: > >Ha

Re: Testing for short message?

At 08:47 AM 12/25/2005, Mark R. London wrote: Has anyone come up with a way to test for short messages? I.e., I want to test for short messages that only include a single URL. Thanks for any help. - Mark You can test for message body-text length by doing a body rule such as this: body_

Re: Testing meta rule

On Tuesday 20 December 2005 12:05, Theo Van Dinter wrote: >On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 11:00:18AM -0600, Casey King wrote: >> have created two rules, and I want to make sure all geocities >> emails are tagged as spam, while at the same time, allowing SA >> users messages to be allowed without spam tagg

  1   2   >