D Hill wrote:
On Fri, 23 May 2008 at 10:32 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Good morning all,
I am trying to use SA to test a DNSBL and I am not having any luck
getting the rule to hit. I've looked through 20_dnsbl_tests.cf, and
read the appropriate section in the docs.
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#rule_definitions_and_privileged_settings
Here is what I have currently,
header RCVD_IN_SIP eval:check_rbl('sip', 'sip.invaluement.com.')
describe RCVD_IN_SIP sender is known in Invaluement list
tflags RCVD_IN_SIP net
score RCVD_IN_SIP 0.01
And yes, when I query my rbldnsd server from the server running SA
with an IP known to be in the list, I do get the proper response.
Anyone see a flaw in this concept?
To me that rule looks fine. Perhaps your testing is completely within
your trusted path? Feed the message with SpamAssassin with the -D debug
switch to see for sure.
That is how I have been testing it.
spamassassin -D < test-mail 2>&1 | grep invaluement
No joy, no real clue where to check next. Here is a link to the rule,
message, and results from spamassassin debug.
http://pixelhammer.com/Dan/dnsbl_rule_test.txt
DAve
--
In 50 years, our descendants will look back on the early years
of the internet, and much like we now look back on men with
rockets on their back and feathers glued to their arms, marvel
that we had the intelligence to wipe the drool from our chins.
