LuKreme wrote:
> On 16-Dec-2008, at 23:57, ram wrote:
>> http://www.surbl.org/usage-policy.html
>
>
> I did the 'request a quote'. For 3,000 users and 550,000 emails a day
> (hey, i was just making up numbers here) the cost is US$600/year. If
> you're a non-profit it's $500/year.
>
> Consideri
> -Original Message-
> From: u...@3.am [mailto:u...@3.am]
> Sent: 2008-12-17 23:16
> To: SA Mailing list
> Subject: Re: remove SURBL rules
>
>
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, LuKreme wrote:
>
> > On 16-Dec-2008, at 23:57, ram wrote:
> >> http://www.sur
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, LuKreme wrote:
On 16-Dec-2008, at 23:57, ram wrote:
http://www.surbl.org/usage-policy.html
I did the 'request a quote'. For 3,000 users and 550,000 emails a day (hey,
i was just making up numbers here) the cost is US$600/year. If you're a
non-profit it's $500/year.
LuKreme a écrit :
> On 16-Dec-2008, at 23:57, ram wrote:
>> http://www.surbl.org/usage-policy.html
>
>
> I did the 'request a quote'. For 3,000 users and 550,000 emails a day
> (hey, i was just making up numbers here) the cost is US$600/year. If
> you're a non-profit it's $500/year.
>
> Conside
On 16-Dec-2008, at 23:57, ram wrote:
http://www.surbl.org/usage-policy.html
I did the 'request a quote'. For 3,000 users and 550,000 emails a day
(hey, i was just making up numbers here) the cost is US$600/year. If
you're a non-profit it's $500/year.
Considering that includes SUPPORT, t
Karsten Bräckelmann a écrit :
> Back on-list.
>
> On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 17:02 +0530, ram wrote:
>> On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 12:16 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> score *_SURBL 0
I dont want that since that will cause a lint fail incase the rules are
removed later
>>> No, it won't, i
Back on-list.
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 17:02 +0530, ram wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 12:16 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > > > score *_SURBL 0
> > >
> > > I dont want that since that will cause a lint fail incase the rules are
> > > removed later
> >
> > No, it won't, it lints just fine.
>
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 12:27 +0530, ram wrote:
> > score *_SURBL 0
>
> I dont want that since that will cause a lint fail incase the rules are
> removed later
No, it won't, it lints just fine.
# cat foo.cf
score NO_SUCH_RULE 0
# spamassassin --lint; echo $?
0
Why do you claim it would? Testin
On 17.12.08 12:05, ram wrote:
> I would like to remove the SURBL lookups from our servers since they are
> no longer free (and their charges are unreasonable )
I think they dropped charges a bit, did you look now?
> I would just put a 0.0 score in local.cf for all their rules , but I
> guess wh
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Ons, December 17, 2008 07:35, ram wrote:
I would like to remove the SURBL lookups from our servers since they
are no longer free (and their charges are unreasonable )
show links where this is stated or make a bug on it :)
else:
score *_SURBL 0
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, ram wrote:
I would like to remove the SURBL lookups from our servers since they are
no longer free (and their charges are unreasonable )
I would just put a 0.0 score in local.cf for all their rules , but I
guess when the rules are removed from the actual cf files by sa-upd
Hi!
I would like to remove the SURBL lookups from our servers since they
are no longer free (and their charges are unreasonable )
show links where this is stated or make a bug on it :)
http://www.surbl.org/usage-policy.html
So you have bigger message volume, this applies to many lists. S
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 07:43 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Ons, December 17, 2008 07:35, ram wrote:
> > I would like to remove the SURBL lookups from our servers since they
> > are no longer free (and their charges are unreasonable )
>
> show links where this is stated or make a bug on it :)
>
On Ons, December 17, 2008 07:35, ram wrote:
> I would like to remove the SURBL lookups from our servers since they
> are no longer free (and their charges are unreasonable )
show links where this is stated or make a bug on it :)
else:
score *_SURBL 0
--
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? htt
14 matches
Mail list logo
