RE: question on training spamassassin

2006-03-02 Thread Webmaster
> -Original Message- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: March 2, 2006 8:53 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: question on training spamassassin > > Webmaster wrote: > > >> Also if your

Re: question on training spamassassin

2006-03-02 Thread Matt Kettler
Webmaster wrote: >> Also if your users are only or mostly forwarding spam, SA's >> bayes is going to have a bayes bias that all messages >> forwarded by your mail clients are spam, regardless of content. >> >> > > Does this also mean that it is almost useless to share bayes from > one server t

RE: question on training spamassassin

2006-03-02 Thread Bowie Bailey
Webmaster wrote: > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Jeff Portwine wrote: > > > Hmm.. I don't quite understand this.At my company, we forward > > > any spam that gets through to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and any ham marked > > > as spam to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... this was set up long

RE: question on training spamassassin

2006-03-01 Thread Webmaster
> -Original Message- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: February 27, 2006 5:18 PM > To: Jeff Portwine > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: question on training spamassassin > > Jeff Portwine wrote: > >

Re: question on training spamassassin

2006-02-28 Thread jdow
al Message - From: "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ; "'Theo Van Dinter'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 1:09 AM Subject: Re: question on training spamassassin Thanks. I read the wiki. This is unfortunate because

Re: question on training spamassassin

2006-02-28 Thread Kris Deugau
Webmaster wrote: This is unfortunate because many clients are still using this client: "Microsoft Outlook Express: It does not appear to have a redirect option" Hmm. OE is actually one of the better clients for retrieving a "true" copy of the original message that was downloaded via POP3. A

Re: question on training spamassassin

2006-02-28 Thread Jeff Portwine
- Original Message - From: "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ; "'Theo Van Dinter'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 1:09 AM Subject: Re: question on training spamassassin Thanks. I read the wiki. This is unf

Re: question on training spamassassin

2006-02-27 Thread Loren Wilton
> Thanks. I read the wiki. > This is unfortunate because many clients are still using this client: > "Microsoft Outlook Express: It does not appear to have a redirect option" True statement, but not necessarily important. I'm running OE, and I have spam and ham mb's set up on the Linux box as im

Re: question on training spamassassin

2006-02-27 Thread Matt Kettler
Jeff Portwine wrote: > Hmm.. I don't quite understand this.At my company, we forward any > spam that gets through to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and any ham marked as spam to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... this was set up long ago before I even started > working here and the spam filter worked really well. Re

RE: question on training spamassassin

2006-02-27 Thread Webmaster
> -Original Message- > From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: February 27, 2006 11:18 AM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: question on training spamassassin > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 02:14:22PM -0500, Jeff Portwine wrote: >

RE: question on training spamassassin

2006-02-27 Thread Webmaster
> -Original Message- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: February 27, 2006 11:30 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: question on training spamassassin > > Webmaster wrote: > > A large numbe

Re: question on training spamassassin

2006-02-27 Thread Jeff Portwine
e it does work for us, but you're saying it shouldn't ? - Original Message - From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 2:29 PM Subject: Re: question on training spamassassin Webmaster wrote: A

Re: question on training spamassassin

2006-02-27 Thread Matt Kettler
Webmaster wrote: > A large number of our clients are using POP. > If I were to ask them to send false negatives to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > and false positives to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so I can place them in > a folder and train, does that hinder the training process in > anyway knowing that the header

Re: question on training spamassassin

2006-02-27 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 02:14:22PM -0500, Jeff Portwine wrote: > I'm a SA newbie myself, but I believe I've read that all the headers, etc, > are stripped before the learning takes place, so it should work fine for > you to have your users go ahead and do that for training. > > Somebody here wi

Re: question on training spamassassin

2006-02-27 Thread Jeff Portwine
I'm a SA newbie myself, but I believe I've read that all the headers, etc, are stripped before the learning takes place, so it should work fine for you to have your users go ahead and do that for training. Somebody here will correct me if i'm wrong... -Jeff - Original Message - From