On Saturday, March 4, 2006, 6:29:27 AM, Rob McEwen wrote:
> I have an e-mail address of a former employee of a client of mine that I use
> (with permission) to monitor spam since this address receives MUCH spam. Of
> course, it is within the realm of possibility that some of this was actually
> sub
If someone threatened me like that I'd totally block them and tell them
to bring it on.
Rob McEwen a écrit :
> and followup from me, please re*ply with NoThankYou in the subject,
> or click this self re*moval link: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> =3DNoThankYoualpha
>
> W*ARNING: There will be a $500 fine PER INCIDENT
> for=
> False Sp*am accusations,
> resulting in loss of bu*siness for
Rob McEwen a écrit :
> Mouss said:
>
>
>>...or you serve other people.
>
>
> Don't mean to change the subject... but I do provide e-mail services for
> other companies... should I have something in writing from them making me
> explicitly NOT to be held liable or legally responsible for blockin
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 12:30:25PM -0800, Gary W. Smith wrote:
> I'm not an attorney so this isn't real legal advice but what are "False
> Sp*am accusations". Block them for being a Spammer not a Sp*ammer. I
> highly doubt that even in the remote possibility that this was opted
> into that they c
Rob,
I'm not an attorney so this isn't real legal advice but what are "False
Sp*am accusations". Block them for being a Spammer not a Sp*ammer. I
highly doubt that even in the remote possibility that this was opted
into that they could even remotely take any legal action against you.
You shoul
>...
>Paul Shupak:
>
>Very nice disection/research of that spam! I learned much just from your
>message. I really appreciate the time you took if only that it helps me (and
>probably some others...) learn a bit more about how to investigate these types
>of e-mails.
>
>This thread was well worth
Paul Shupak:
Very nice disection/research of that spam! I learned much just from your
message. I really appreciate the time you took if only that it helps me (and
probably some others...) learn a bit more about how to investigate these types
of e-mails.
This thread was well worth it just of th
>I have an e-mail address of a former employee of a client of mine that I use
>(with permission) to monitor spam since this address receives MUCH spam. Of
>course, it is within the realm of possibility that some of this was actually
>subscribed to, but most of it is spam. Therefore, this account ha
Mouss said:
>...or you serve other people.
Don't mean to change the subject... but I do provide e-mail services for
other companies... should I have something in writing from them making me
explicitly NOT to be held liable or legally responsible for blocking
messages that I deem as spam? Any sugg
Rob McEwen a écrit :
> I have an e-mail address of a former employee of a client of mine that I use
> (with permission) to monitor spam since this address receives MUCH spam. Of
> course, it is within the realm of possibility that some of this was actually
> subscribed to, but most of it is spam. T
Personally I'd forward it to the FTC/FBI and let them decide if this is
mabye spam.
Loren
12 matches
Mail list logo
