Re: false positives from HELO_DYNAMIC_HCC and HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR rules

2004-10-29 Thread Justin Mason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matt Kettler writes: > At 01:26 PM 10/29/2004, Mark Christoph wrote: > >As a result, I lowered the scores for HELO_DYNAMIC_HCC and > >HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR. > >I also forced bayes to relearn the email as ham, etc. The other > >problem is that the send

Re: false positives from HELO_DYNAMIC_HCC and HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR rules

2004-10-29 Thread Matt Kettler
At 01:26 PM 10/29/2004, Mark Christoph wrote: As a result, I lowered the scores for HELO_DYNAMIC_HCC and HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR. I also forced bayes to relearn the email as ham, etc. The other problem is that the sender of the message informed me that it is not a dynamically assigned address. It is

RE: false positives from HELO_DYNAMIC_HCC and HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR rules

2004-10-29 Thread marti
-Original Message- From: Mark Christoph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 October 2004 18:26 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: false positives from HELO_DYNAMIC_HCC and HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR rules We are running SA 3.0.1 site wide at my company and I had some false positives due

Re: false positives from HELO_DYNAMIC_HCC and HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR rules

2004-10-29 Thread Raymond Dijkxhoorn
Hi! Here are the scores: Content analysis details: (-98.8 points, 6.0 required) pts rule name description -- -- 0.5 HELO_DYNAMIC_HCC Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (HCC) 0.5 HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR