Hi!
Here are the scores: Content analysis details: (-98.8 points, 6.0 required)
pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.5 HELO_DYNAMIC_HCC Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (HCC) 0.5 HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (IP addr 1) -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 1.0 MY_GAPPY_BODY BODY: MY: contains G.a.p.p.y-T.e.x.t 1.8 URG_BIZ BODY: Contains urgent matter -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000]
As a result, I lowered the scores for HELO_DYNAMIC_HCC and HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR. I also forced bayes to relearn the email as ham, etc. The other problem is that the sender of the message informed me that it is not a dynamically assigned address. It is an ADSL connection from the Netherlands with a fixed IP address.
If he runs a consumer link, sure, thats the things he pays for. He might be better of with other services xs4all runs. Then he can change reverse for his line and everybody is happy. Another solution for him is to relay his mail on his ISPs mailservers.
Bye, Raymond.
