Re: dns: sendto() failed:

2009-10-30 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 19:09 -0200, Rob Lingelbach wrote: > The other > possibility arose that because SELinux was also somewhat changed in > the multi-package update, that it was being more strict, but adjusting > iptables for port 53 fixed. thank you Mark. > IME SELinux is a pain in the

Re: dns: sendto() failed:

2009-10-30 Thread Rob Lingelbach
On Oct 30, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Mark Martinec wrote: immediately perceptible relevant update) and now this error: (CentOS) Oct 30 15:34:31 spamd[16264]: dns: sendto() failed: Connection refused at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/ SpamAssassin/DnsResolver.pm line 395 Check health of the

Re: dns: sendto() failed:

2009-10-30 Thread Mark Martinec
Rob, > Been running Spamassassin for a long time with no problems until a > recent update of various packages including perl (but no other > immediately perceptible relevant update) and now this error: > > Oct 30 15:34:31 spamd[16264]: dns: sendto() > failed: Connection refused at /usr/lib/perl

Re: dns: sendto() failed: Connection refused

2009-03-23 Thread Mark Martinec
Chris, > Mar 23 18:01:08 localhost spamd[3676]: dns: sendto() failed: > Connection refused > at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/DnsResolver.pm > line 395, line 45. man 2 sendto [ECONNREFUSED] The socket received an ICMP destination unreachable message from the l

Re: dns: sendto() failed: Connection refused

2009-03-23 Thread Matt Kettler
Chris wrote: > I caused this myself I believe but I'm wondering why. I'm having issues > getting named to work correctly in chroot configuration, it will run but > when started reports zone files not found even though they are where I > have them in the named.conf file. Are they in the path listed