Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 1:36:24 AM, Matus wrote:
> Postfix can't use spamassassin directly, you _need_ to use something
> and that somethink
FYI: You can pipe to SpamAssassin directly from Postfix:
master.cf:
...
spamass unix - n n - 15 pipe
user=spamd argv=/usr/
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > You still did not explain us how do you connect postfix with spamassassin.
> > There are many ways to do this, but you have only denied all possible ways
> > we mentioned but you didn't provide the way you use.
On 06.06.11 09:01, asimhafeez wrote:
> Here is how
Just re-iterate spamassassin in any form will do nothing other than
yag the email. It's another programs job to do this. Personally I'd
recommend a mailscanner based solution to this problem
On Monday, 6 June 2011, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:30:10 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
> wro
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:30:10 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
wrote:
>>> Postfix with SpamAssassin not any milter amavis or mailscanner.
>> main.cf:
>> ...
>> header_checks = pcre:$config_directory/pcre.header_checks
>> pcre.header_checks:
>> ...
>> # Discard Spam over 15.
>> /^X-Spam-Level: \*{15,}/ DISC
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> On 06.06.11 08:31, asimhafeez wrote:
>> My scenario is as following.
>>
>> Internet --> "eth0" [ spam-filtering in bridging] "eth1" -->
>> "LocalAreaConnection"[Email Hosting Server with multiple domains,
>> directly
>> connected over ethernet with spam-filter
On 06.06.11 08:31, asimhafeez wrote:
> My scenario is as following.
>
> Internet --> "eth0" [ spam-filtering in bridging] "eth1" -->
> "LocalAreaConnection"[Email Hosting Server with multiple domains, directly
> connected over ethernet with spam-filtering machine]
you really don't need to repeat
asimhafeez wrote:
>
>
> Duane Hill-2 wrote:
>>
>> Hello asimhafeez,
>>
>> Monday, June 6, 2011, 10:10:55 AM, you wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 07:00:02 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
>
> > wrote:
> >> Is there any possibility
Duane Hill-2 wrote:
>
> Hello asimhafeez,
>
> Monday, June 6, 2011, 10:10:55 AM, you wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>>
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 07:00:02 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
> wrote:
>> Is there any possibility to delete spam instead of marking
(
> >> > On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 07:00:02 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
> >> In the above scenario I tried using postfix with spamassassin
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > postfix with spamassassin how?
> > This is the important question.
> > Milter? amavis? mailscanner?
On 06.06.11 08:10, asimhafeez wrot
Hello asimhafeez,
Monday, June 6, 2011, 10:10:55 AM, you wrote:
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>
>>> > On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 07:00:02 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
>>>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >> Is there any possibility to delete spam instead of marking (rewriting)
>>> >> the
>>> >> emails as [SPAM] in su
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
>> > On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 07:00:02 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
>>
>> > wrote:
>> >> Is there any possibility to delete spam instead of marking (rewriting)
>> >> the
>> >> emails as [SPAM] in subject.
>> >> In my scenario users mailboxes are hosted to another machine a
> > On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 07:00:02 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
> > wrote:
> >> Is there any possibility to delete spam instead of marking (rewriting)
> >> the
> >> emails as [SPAM] in subject.
> >> In my scenario users mailboxes are hosted to another machine and i want
> >> to
> >> filter the spam in a s
On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 10:32:11 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
wrote:
> If you think procmail can do this job, kindly let me know how can i use.
I
> don't think procmail can do this job because users mailboxes are on
remote
> machine.
procmail needs unix account, mua can run without one
users should just l
Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 07:00:02 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
> wrote:
>
>> Is there any possibility to delete spam instead of marking (rewriting)
> the
>> emails as [SPAM] in subject.
>> In my scenario users mailboxes are hosted to another machine and i want
> to
>> filter th
On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 07:00:02 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
wrote:
> Is there any possibility to delete spam instead of marking (rewriting)
the
> emails as [SPAM] in subject.
> In my scenario users mailboxes are hosted to another machine and i want
to
> filter the spam in a separate machine instead of fi
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 07:00 -0700, asimhafeez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any possibility to delete spam instead of marking (rewriting) the
> emails as [SPAM] in subject.
> In my scenario users mailboxes are hosted to another machine and i want to
> filter the spam in a separate machine instead of f
My scenario is as following.
Internet --> "eth0" [ spam-filtering in bridging] "eth1" -->
"LocalAreaConnection"[Email Hosting Server with multiple domains, directly
connected over ethernet with spam-filtering machine]
In the above scenario I tried using postfix with spamassassin it works, but
pe
Hello asimhafeez,
Sunday, June 5, 2011, 3:00:02 PM, you wrote:
a> Is there any possibility to delete spam instead of marking (rewriting) the
a> emails as [SPAM] in subject.
If you're using procmail-
# All mail with a score higher than 10 is dumped to /dev/null
:0
* ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\
Depends on how you are calling SA , what u do with the email after
scanning isn't the job of SA that's down to another program
On Sunday, 5 June 2011, asimhafeez wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there any possibility to delete spam instead of marking (rewriting) the
> emails as [SPAM] in subject.
> In my
19 matches
Mail list logo
