> On Die, 2010-11-02 at 18:31 -0230, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
> > As a sort of follow up to my last message, I was wondering how
> > complicated it is to write a rule that would compare the From: and
> > Reply-To: headers, and set it to 0.001 or make it a meta rule that could
> > be used in con
On 2010/11/03 8:05 AM, haman...@t-online.de wrote:
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
It's the only purpose of the Reply-To header to be different from To: -
otherwise it can be omitted anyways.
What did I miss?
Hi Bernd, although I have seen scenarios using the feature, they never involved
both addresses
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
It's the only purpose of the Reply-To header to be different from To: -
otherwise it can be omitted anyways.
What did I miss?
Hi Bernd, although I have seen scenarios using the feature, they never involved
both addresses as free mail accounts.
So a meta combined with freem
On Die, 2010-11-02 at 18:31 -0230, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
> As a sort of follow up to my last message, I was wondering how
> complicated it is to write a rule that would compare the From: and
> Reply-To: headers, and set it to 0.001 or make it a meta rule that could
> be used in conjunction w
On 02/11/2010 6:43 PM, Chris Conn wrote:
On 2010-11-02 17:01, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
As a sort of follow up to my last message, I was wondering how
complicated it is to write a rule that would compare the From: and
Reply-To: headers, and set it to 0.001 or make it a meta rule that could
be use
On 2010-11-02 17:01, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
As a sort of follow up to my last message, I was wondering how
complicated it is to write a rule that would compare the From: and
Reply-To: headers, and set it to 0.001 or make it a meta rule that could
be used in conjunction with others?
Would this
