On 2010/11/03 8:05 AM, haman...@t-online.de wrote:
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: It's the only purpose of the Reply-To header to be different from To: - otherwise it can be omitted anyways. What did I miss?Hi Bernd, although I have seen scenarios using the feature, they never involved both addresses as free mail accounts. So a meta combined with freemail rules would do a great job
I think his point was more along the lines of skipping the test for difference, and just test for presence of Reply-To, because they are unlikely to ever be the same.
-- /Jason
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
