Invalid Message-ID:
> Message-ID:
I use courierfilter to drop such "Message-ID:"
and the message will never see my system.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
24V Electronic Engineer
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Am 2009-06-18 11:26:29, schrieb Jeff Drury:
> SA is working for the most part beyond expectations, the only problem I¹m
> having is filtering spoofed email address (i.e. valid_u...@ourdomain.com). I
> am able to filter out non-valid user addresses (i.e. spam...@ourdomain.com).
WHY DOES YOU
Configuring postfix well is extremely effective. For all the time I've
invested trying to minimize the spam that reaches my company's users, that
single web page has helped greater than anything else I've done.
Postfix should be your first line of defense. SpamAssassin is usually your
second and
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Fri, June 19, 2009 04:09, David B Funk wrote:
> > The last 3 you can install using CPAN, Razor2 has to be explcitly fetched
> > installed and configured (but is worth it).
>
> newer use CPAN direct on a host that uses RPM/DEB/PORTAGE/BSD
>
> make a n
On Fri, June 19, 2009 18:18, Jeff Drury wrote:
> I guess many would find this acceptable, but to me no spam is my target
no it wont stop users sending html and images to maillists, but it would
be nice if it did :)
--
xpoint
Has this caught spoofed mail? On an average day I successfully filter approx
10k junk mail messages, only about 5-10 make it through for the entire
organization, of these our individual mail programs filter these as junk...
I guess many would find this acceptable, but to me no spam is my target
O
I highly recommend using Postfix to prevent some of this from even getting
through to SpamAssassin to begin with.
This was the most helpful page for me. I've modified things to suit my own
needs, of course. The results have been stellar. SpamAssassin barely does
any work now.
http://jimsun.linxn
On Fri, June 19, 2009 04:09, David B Funk wrote:
> The last 3 you can install using CPAN, Razor2 has to be explcitly fetched
> installed and configured (but is worth it).
newer use CPAN direct on a host that uses RPM/DEB/PORTAGE/BSD
make a native RPM/DEP/PORTAGE/BSD from CPAN is the way to go, if
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Jeff Drury wrote:
http://pastebin.ca/1465504
On 6/18/09 2:00 PM, "Benny Pedersen" wrote:
On Thu, June 18, 2009 22:33, Jeff Drury wrote:
They don¹t appear to be scored at all (see attached header)
test:
spamassassin 2>&1 -D --lint
any errors here ?
spamassassin 2>
On Fri, June 19, 2009 01:22, Jeff Drury wrote:
> http://pastebin.ca/1465504
#
[49973] dbg: spf: cannot get Envelope-From, cannot use SPF
#
[49973] dbg: spf: def_spf_whitelist_from: could not find useable envelope
sender
#
[49973] dbg: spf: already checked for Received-SPF headers, proceeding
with
http://pastebin.ca/1465504
On 6/18/09 2:00 PM, "Benny Pedersen" wrote:
>
> On Thu, June 18, 2009 22:33, Jeff Drury wrote:
>> > They don¹t appear to be scored at all (see attached header)
>
> test:
>
> spamassassin 2>&1 -D --lint
>
> any errors here ?
>
> spamassassin 2>&1 -D -t msgtotest |
On Thu, June 18, 2009 23:33, Jeff Drury wrote:
> No errors... The only error I ever received had to do with rewriting the
> subject which was unimportant to me so I commented it out, other then that
> no errors
stop sending me mail in private for things you ask public about
still like to see the
>>
>> SA is working for the most part beyond expectations, the only problem I=B9m
>> having is filtering spoofed email address (i.e. valid_u...@ourdomain.com). =
>> I
>> am able to filter out non-valid user addresses (i.e. spam...@ourdomain.com)=
>> .
>> I run SA-Update daily, have piped well over
No errors... The only error I ever received had to do with rewriting the
subject which was unimportant to me so I commented it out, other then that
no errors
On 6/18/09 2:00 PM, "Benny Pedersen" wrote:
>
> On Thu, June 18, 2009 22:33, Jeff Drury wrote:
>> > They don¹t appear to be scored at al
On Thu, June 18, 2009 22:33, Jeff Drury wrote:
> They don¹t appear to be scored at all (see attached header)
test:
spamassassin 2>&1 -D --lint
any errors here ?
spamassassin 2>&1 -D -t msgtotest | less
press s in the less output and post on pastebin
i belive you miss envelope_sender_header i
They don¹t appear to be scored at all (see attached header)
Return-Path:
Received: from murder ([unix socket])
by impactps.com (Cyrus v2.3.8-OS X Server 10.5:9C31) with LMTPA;
Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:28:22 -0700
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.3
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Tors, Juni 18, 2009 20:36, Rick Macdougall wrote:
I'd recommend upgrading to the latest version (3.2.5) and running and
sa-update to get the latest rules.
how will this help on spoofed mail problem ?
The improved rules should help catch them.
Rick
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Jeff Drury wrote:
SA is working for the most part beyond expectations, the only problem
I?m having is filtering spoofed email address (i.e.
valid_u...@ourdomain.com). I am able to filter out non-valid user
addresses (i.e. spam...@ourdomain.com). I run SA-Update daily, have
On Tors, Juni 18, 2009 20:36, Rick Macdougall wrote:
> I'd recommend upgrading to the latest version (3.2.5) and running and
> sa-update to get the latest rules.
how will this help on spoofed mail problem ?
--
xpoint
Jeff Drury wrote:
SA is working for the most part beyond expectations, the only problem
I’m having is filtering spoofed email address (i.e.
valid_u...@ourdomain.com). I am able to filter out non-valid user
addresses (i.e. spam...@ourdomain.com). I run SA-Update daily, have
piped well over 500
On Tors, Juni 18, 2009 20:26, Jeff Drury wrote:
> sa-learn, yet they still come through. I know this is a generic outline of
> the problem, but it¹s a start, if you need more info I can send it.
http://old.openspf.org/wizard.html?mydomain=impactps.com&submit=Go!
next do a spf test in mta level,
Chris St. Pierre wrote:
On Tue, 6 May 2008, mhildebr wrote:
Is there a way to have Spamassassin look for spoofed email addresses
being
used as the sender's address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) but using a different
user name (Viagra instead of myname)? It seems like it would be
simple to
check the u
On Tue, 6 May 2008, mhildebr wrote:
Is there a way to have Spamassassin look for spoofed email addresses being
used as the sender's address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) but using a different
user name (Viagra instead of myname)? It seems like it would be simple to
check the user name and filter results
mhildebr wrote:
Is there a way to have Spamassassin look for spoofed email addresses being
used as the sender's address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) but using a different
user name (Viagra instead of myname)? It seems like it would be simple to
check the user name and filter results from that. Thanks fo
mhildebr wrote:
Is there a way to have Spamassassin look for spoofed email addresses being
used as the sender's address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) but using a different
user name (Viagra instead of myname)? It seems like it would be simple to
check the user name and filter results from that. Thanks fo
25 matches
Mail list logo
