On 04/25/2018 01:19 PM, Amir Caspi wrote:
On Apr 25, 2018, at 11:08 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
actually, no. it changes to users as needed. This way multiple users can use
spamd with per-user config files.
Sorry, let me be more clear: if spamc is invoked by root, such that spamd would t
On Apr 25, 2018, at 11:08 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> actually, no. it changes to users as needed. This way multiple users can use
> spamd with per-user config files.
Sorry, let me be more clear: if spamc is invoked by root, such that spamd would
try to setuid root, then spamd runs as
On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 19:08:56 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
5.04.18 09:06, Amir Caspi wrote:
> >spamd running as root doesn't run as root; it downgrades itself to
> >"nobody."
>
> actually, no. it changes to users as needed. This way multiple users
> can use spamd with per-user config file
On Apr 25, 2018, at 8:57 AM, Paul R. Ganci wrote:
Sorry I should have mentioned that. I was aware of that issue. As you can
see spamd is running as root in this case and the spamassassin tests were
also done as root.
do you hace any per-user rules in ~root/.spamassassin/ ?
spamassassin will ho
On Apr 25, 2018, at 8:57 AM, Paul R. Ganci wrote:
>
> Sorry I should have mentioned that. I was aware of that issue. As you can see
> spamd is running as root in this case and the spamassassin tests were also
> done as root.
spamd running as root doesn't run as root; it downgrades itself to "n
On 04/25/2018 04:24 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
spamc connects to spamd, which may run under different user than
spamassassin. That way, different users' settings are used.
check how does your spamd run (which user, if any)
Sorry I should have mentioned that. I was aware of that issue.
On 24.04.18 23:22, Paul R. Ganci wrote:
I recently setup a new install of an email server on a CentOS 7
server. Everything is working correctly except for this problem:
>spamassassin --test-mode
Content analysis details: (9.6 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
-
