Re: spamassassin 3.2.0 default setup detects legitimate email as spam

2007-12-04 Thread mouss
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi gurus, > > Recently, I've upgraded to spamassassin 3.2.0 called from amavisd-new. > I've seen that this version is more agressive, and for example it > detect as spam > a legitimate email with next score: > > X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=4.884 tagged_above=-999 required=3

Re: spamassassin 3.2.0 default setup detects legitimate email as spam

2007-12-04 Thread Richard Frovarp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi gurus, Recently, I've upgraded to spamassassin 3.2.0 called from amavisd-new. I've seen that this version is more agressive, and for example it detect as spam a legitimate email with next score: X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=4.884 tagged_above=-999 required=3.5 test

Re: Spamassassin 3.2.0

2007-05-22 Thread Ming Hou
aders for Crypt::OpenSSL::Random to install. - Original Message - From: Ming Hou To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 2:00 AM Subject: Re: Spamassassin 3.2.0 Thank all of your replies. I did try the following option: perl Makefile.PL INC='-I/usr/loc

Re: Spamassassin 3.2.0

2007-05-22 Thread Jari Fredriksson
Subject: Re: Spamassassin 3.2.0 Thank all of your replies. I did try the following option: perl Makefile.PL INC='-I/usr/local/ssl/include' LIBS='-L/usr/local/ssl/lib -lssl -lcrypto' The "make test" still failed for the SSL portion. Any ideal? Thanks. ming Ro

Re: Spamassassin 3.2.0

2007-05-21 Thread maillist
Ming Hou wrote: Thank all of your replies. I did try the following option: perl Makefile.PL INC='-I/usr/local/ssl/include' LIBS='-L/usr/local/ssl/lib -lssl -lcrypto' The "make test" still failed for the SSL portion. Any ideal? Thanks. ming After fighting with many problems with this

Re: Spamassassin 3.2.0

2007-05-21 Thread Ming Hou
Thank all of your replies. I did try the following option: perl Makefile.PL INC='-I/usr/local/ssl/include' LIBS='-L/usr/local/ssl/lib -lssl -lcrypto' The "make test" still failed for the SSL portion. Any ideal? Thanks. ming Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: From: Christopher X. Candreva [mailt

RE: Spamassassin 3.2.0

2007-05-21 Thread Rosenbaum, Larry M.
> From: Christopher X. Candreva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Sat, 19 May 2007, Ming Hou wrote: > > > My issue Mail::DKIM and Mail::DomainKeys are required > Crypt::OpenSSL::Random > > and Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA. But, I could not get Crypt::OpenSSL::Random to > be > > built successfully because

Re: Spamassassin 3.2.0

2007-05-21 Thread Mark Martinec
Ming Hou, > > My issue Mail::DKIM and Mail::DomainKeys are required > > Crypt::OpenSSL::Random and Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA. But, I could not get > > Crypt::OpenSSL::Random to be built successfully because it always > > complained the following messages: > > Edit Makefile.PL and add -lssl and -lcrypto

Re: Spamassassin 3.2.0

2007-05-20 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Sat, 19 May 2007, Ming Hou wrote: > My issue Mail::DKIM and Mail::DomainKeys are required Crypt::OpenSSL::Random > and Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA. But, I could not get Crypt::OpenSSL::Random to be > built successfully because it always complained the following messages: > > Note (probably harmless):

Re: Spamassassin 3.2.0 LONG -D --lint times and load times

2007-05-03 Thread Matt Kettler
James Lay wrote: > > So my upgrade of Spamassassin takes a full five minutes to -D --lint > and about the same time to load up. Here's my local.cf file: > > required_score 4.0 > rewrite_header Subject *SPAM* > report_safe 0 > use_bayes 1 > use_

RE: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 and ImageInfo.pm

2007-05-03 Thread Will Nordmeyer
> -Original Message- > From: Nigel Frankcom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 4:11 AM > To: SpamAssassin > Subject: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 and ImageInfo.pm > > Hi All, > > Is anyone else that uses ImageInfo.pm getting the following errors > after updating to 3.2.0? >