From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Friday 03 March 2006 17:56, jdow wrote:
From: "Kelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
jdow wrote:
And of course, when reading BAYES_99 pronouncements one must ALWAYS
be aware that YMMV in big glowing radioactive Cherenkov Radiation
Blue letters is always pres
On Friday 03 March 2006 17:56, jdow wrote:
>From: "Kelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> jdow wrote:
>>> And of course, when reading BAYES_99 pronouncements one must ALWAYS
>>> be aware that YMMV in big glowing radioactive Cherenkov Radiation
>>> Blue letters is always presumed. Matt's note above proves
From: "Kelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
jdow wrote:
And of course, when reading BAYES_99 pronouncements one must ALWAYS be
aware that YMMV in big glowing radioactive Cherenkov Radiation Blue
letters is always presumed. Matt's note above proves it.
Finally, a use for HTML in email!
Though I'm not
jdow wrote:
And of course, when reading BAYES_99 pronouncements one must ALWAYS be
aware that YMMV in big glowing radioactive Cherenkov Radiation Blue
letters is always presumed. Matt's note above proves it.
Finally, a use for HTML in email!
Though I'm not sure beta-particle-induced phosphores
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Michael Monnerie wrote:
http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/173910/e7bf95a7cb044637/
They are wondering why bayes_99 is not given 5 points by default, as it
seems to have no FP.
Statisticaly speaking, 1% of BAYES_99 hits should be nonspam.In reality,
it do
It is graded 5 here. I overrode the perceptron score. So far I have not seen
a false positive that got a BAYES_99 score. I've seen a very small number of
false negatives in spite of the BAYES_99 score.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Hepworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Seems to prod
Title: RE: SpamAssassin tested by lwn.net
> > Michael Monnerie wrote:
> > > http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/173910/e7bf95a7cb044637/
> > >
> > > They are wondering why bayes_99 is not given 5 points by
> default, as it
> > > seems to have no
Matt Kettler writes:
> Michael Monnerie wrote:
> > http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/173910/e7bf95a7cb044637/
> >
> > They are wondering why bayes_99 is not given 5 points by default, as it
> > seems to have no FP.
>
> Statisticaly speaking, 1% of BAYES_99 hits should be nonspam.In reality,
> it doe
Michael Monnerie wrote:
> http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/173910/e7bf95a7cb044637/
>
> They are wondering why bayes_99 is not given 5 points by default, as it
> seems to have no FP.
Statisticaly speaking, 1% of BAYES_99 hits should be nonspam.In reality,
it does a lot better than that.
However, in
Seems to produce != doesn't ever.
Depends on your config, but I think the developers err on the side of
caution a little and don't have single test score that would trigger go over
the default 'is spam' limit.
Could be wrong - frequently am...
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid
10 matches
Mail list logo
