Re: SPF tests and authenticated SMTP

2012-01-05 Thread nsayer
David B Funk wrote: > > > I'm not familiar with the FreeBSD ports tree, but if its > spamass-milter-0.3.2 is the same as the one from > http://www.freshports.org/mail/spamass-milter/ then it does -not- > add the auth tokens to its internally synthesized "Received" header. > Thus your problem

Re: SPF tests and authenticated SMTP

2012-01-05 Thread David B Funk
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012, nsayer wrote: David B Funk wrote: Noel, I assume that you're saying he has a sendmail config problem because his SA isn't 'seeing' the auth tokens. That might not be the case, it may be his milter that is at fault. SA depends upon the auth tokens that your MTA adds to its

Re: SPF tests and authenticated SMTP

2012-01-05 Thread nsayer
Noel Butler wrote: > > Ack, you have far bigger problems then you realise given below... > Question, you are smtp-auth'ing via port 587 aren't you? > > Yes. If you are, > then your sendmail is incorrectly configured and I suggest you load the > news group comp.mail.sendmail and ask there (

Re: SPF tests and authenticated SMTP

2012-01-05 Thread nsayer
David B Funk wrote: > > Noel, > I assume that you're saying he has a sendmail config problem because his > SA isn't 'seeing' the auth tokens. That might not be the case, it may be > his milter that is at fault. > > SA depends upon the auth tokens that your MTA adds to its "Received:" > head

Re: SPF tests and authenticated SMTP

2012-01-05 Thread Dave Funk
Noel, I assume that you're saying he has a sendmail config problem because his SA isn't 'seeing' the auth tokens. That might not be the case, it may be his milter that is at fault. SA depends upon the auth tokens that your MTA adds to its "Received:" header to recognize properly authed messag

Re: SPF tests and authenticated SMTP

2012-01-04 Thread Noel Butler
Ack, you have far bigger problems then you realise given below... Question, you are smtp-auth'ing via port 587 aren't you? If you are, then your sendmail is incorrectly configured and I suggest you load the news group comp.mail.sendmail and ask there (given that would be OT for the SA list) On W

Re: SPF tests and authenticated SMTP

2012-01-04 Thread Nick Sayer
Spam detection software, running on the system "quack.kfu.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see The administrator of that system

Re: SPF tests and authenticated SMTP

2012-01-04 Thread Noel Butler
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 12:51 -0800, nsayer wrote: > I'm running a brand new installation of SA 3.3.2 with the Milter on FreeBSD > 8.2. > > Everything is going smoothly, for the most part (there seems to be one > particular spammer who's evading SA, but whatever), but there's one little > thing tha

Re: SPF tests and authenticated SMTP

2012-01-04 Thread nsayer
More info... I've added sid-filter to the mix, and now I'm getting this additional header: Authentication-Results: quack.kfu.com; sender-id=fail (NotPermitted) header.from=nsa...@kfu.com; auth=pass (PLAIN); spf=fail (NotPermitted) smtp.mfrom=nsa...@kfu.com But Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF d

Re: SPF tests and authenticated SMTP

2012-01-04 Thread nsayer
More info... I've added sid-filter to the mix, and now I'm getting this additional header: Authentication-Results: quack.kfu.com; sender-id=fail (NotPermitted) header.from=nsa...@kfu.com; auth=pass (PLAIN); spf=fail (NotPermitted) smtp.mfrom=nsa...@kfu.com But Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF d