Ack, you have far bigger problems then you realise given below... Question, you are smtp-auth'ing via port 587 aren't you? If you are, then your sendmail is incorrectly configured and I suggest you load the news group comp.mail.sendmail and ask there (given that would be OT for the SA list)
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 17:22 -0800, Nick Sayer wrote: > Content analysis details: (9.1 points, 5.0 required) > > pts rule name description > ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- > 2.4 DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours after Received: date > 0.9 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail) > [SPF failed: Please see > http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;id=nsayer%40kfu.com;ip=166.250.45.174;r=quack.kfu.com] > 1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL RBL: Relay in RNBL, > https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/ > [166.250.45.174 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] > 3.6 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL > [166.250.45.174 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] > 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message > -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from > author's > domain > 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not > necessarily valid > -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK > signature > 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with > dynamic-looking rDNS > 0.7 KHOP_DYNAMIC Relay looks like a dynamic address > 0.0 HELO_MISC_IP Looking for more Dynamic IP Relays >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
