Re: SPF soft fail problem

On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 19:03 +0100, Anthony Cartmell wrote: > >> To everybody; one of the best online diagnostic tool > >> http://www.intodns.com/nawilliams.com > > > > 1. this tool didn't find the error mentioned, and while it's very hard to > > detect this problem, posting this address here just w

Re: SPF soft fail problem

I just wanted to share a useful link which one detects mismatched mirrors -except SPF records- This site also queries DNS but it's much flexible, you can say the IP of DNS, use your own DNS or use public one. http://centralops.net/co/NsLookup.aspx It's useful for system administering, Spamassas

Re: SPF soft fail problem

To everybody; one of the best online diagnostic tool http://www.intodns.com/nawilliams.com 1. this tool didn't find the error mentioned, and while it's very hard to detect this problem, posting this address here just wouldn't help. FWIW, to find DNS inconsistencies you need a full-traversal DN

Re: SPF soft fail problem

> > Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote on 08/23/2010 04:50:39 PM: > > > Looking at it more deeply, nawilliams.com has three nameservers (but > > > only 2 delegations from .com), where two return -all and one returns > > > ~all: > > > > > > % dig spf nawilliams.com @beulah.zootsplace.com. > > > nawilliam

Re: SPF soft fail problem

To everybody; one of the best online diagnostic tool http://www.intodns.com/nawilliams.com On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:55 PM, wrote: > Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote on 08/23/2010 04:50:39 > PM: > > > > > > Looking at it more deeply, nawilliams.com has three

Re: SPF soft fail problem

Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote on 08/23/2010 04:50:39 PM: > > Looking at it more deeply, nawilliams.com has three nameservers (but only 2 > delegations from .com), where two return -all and one returns ~all: > > % dig spf nawilliams.com @beulah.zootsplace.com. > nawilliams.com. 30

Re: SPF soft fail problem

> > > The domain in question is nawilliams.com. This is the SPF record: > > > > > > "v=spf1 mx ptr ~all" > Benny Pedersen wrote on 08/23/2010 02:45:07 PM: > > ptr is unsafe to use in spf > > > > ~all means domain owner dont know what thay are doing On 23.08.10 15:25, vergottini.n...@tatravelce

Re: SPF soft fail problem

On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 15:25 -0400, vergottini.n...@tatravelcenters.com wrote: > Benny Pedersen wrote on 08/23/2010 02:45:07 PM: > > > > The domain in question is nawilliams.com. This is the SPF record: > > > > > > "v=spf1 mx ptr ~all" > > > > ptr is unsafe to use in spf > > > > ~all means doma

Re: SPF soft fail problem

Benny Pedersen wrote on 08/23/2010 02:45:07 PM: > > The domain in question is nawilliams.com. This is the SPF record: > > > > "v=spf1 mx ptr ~all" > > ptr is unsafe to use in spf > > ~all means domain owner dont know what thay are doing I figured as much. What I don't understand is why this

Re: SPF soft fail problem

Michael Scheidell wrote on 08/23/2010 11:59:06 AM: > you will need to provide more information. > > post ALL the headers, and state which one is the last untrusted received > header. Here is what I see in the Exim reject log. I'm not sure quite what you mean by "last untrusted received hea

Re: SPF soft fail problem

On 8/23/10 11:51 AM, vergottini.n...@tatravelcenters.com wrote: I'm having a problem with SPF soft fail detection for a particular domain that I cannot explain. Emails are being rejected for the domain because emails are being hit with the SPF_FAIL rule, but according to the SPF record, they s