Michael Scheidell <michael.scheid...@secnap.com> wrote on 08/23/2010
11:59:06 AM:
> you will need to provide more information.
>
> post ALL the headers, and state which one is the last untrusted received
> header.
Here is what I see in the Exim reject log. I'm not sure quite what you
mean by "last untrusted received header". The last received header is the
one added by my host. The one prior to that was added by an untrusted
host.
Keep in mind, however, that the issue isn't that I'm getting a fail. I'm
expecting it to fail. The issue is that I'm getting a hard fail instead
of a soft fail as specified by the SPF record.
Neil
---
2010-08-22 21:22:30 1OnLk4-0005H0-MS H=server70a.appriver.com
(server70.appriver.com) [69.20.116.35] F=<mmccutch...@nawilliams.com>
rejected after DATA: Message scored 12.8 spam points.
Envelope-from: <mmccutch...@nawilliams.com>
Envelope-to: <stukus.da...@tatravelcenters.com>
P Received: from server70a.appriver.com ([69.20.116.35]
helo=server70.appriver.com)
by lnxsrv4.ta.com (envelope-from
<mmccutch...@nawilliams.com>)
with smtp (Exim 4.71)
id 1OnLk4-0005H0-MS
for stukus.da...@tatravelcenters.com; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 21:22:29
-0400
X-Note-AR-ScanTimeLocal: 8/22/2010 9:22:41 PM
X-Policy: GLOBAL - nawilliams.com
X-Primary: mmccutch...@nawilliams.com
X-Note: This Email was scanned by AppRiver SecureTide
X-ALLOW: @nawilliams.com ALLOWED
X-Virus-Scan: V-
X-Note: Spam Tests Failed:
X-Country-Path: PRIVATE->UNITED STATES->UNITED STATES
X-Note-Sending-IP: 69.15.41.219
X-Note-Reverse-DNS:
X-Note-WHTLIST: mmccutch...@nawilliams.com
X-Note: User Rule Hits:
X-Note: Global Rule Hits: G202 G203 G204 G205 G209 G210 G221 G309
X-Note: Encrypt Rule Hits:
X-Note: Mail Class: ALLOWEDSENDER
X-Note: Headers Injected
P Received: from [69.15.41.219] (HELO nawatl01.NAWATL.local)
by server70.appriver.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.7)
with ESMTP id 142957128 for stukus.da...@tatravelcenters.com; Sun, 22
Aug 2010 21:22:40 -0400
P Received: from 10.2.18.2 ([10.2.18.2]) by nawatl01.NAWATL.local
([10.2.18.2]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ;
Mon, 23 Aug 2010 01:22:36 +0000
Subject: Re: Requested Information
References:
<fc419b3cb698ac4d823457a3ad28916dda3...@nawatl01.nawatl.local>
<231136984.81985.1282236522847.javamail.r...@sz0052a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net>
<off8754b0b.71f4a035-on86257784.005c78bb-86257784.005d4...@localdomain>
<of2aa0e4a3.6dbd97f9-on85257788.0002aac5-85257788.00065...@tatravelcenters.com>
F From: "Mike McCutcheon" <mmccutch...@nawilliams.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Apple-Mail-12--723357858";
charset="iso-8859-1"
In-Reply-To:
<of2aa0e4a3.6dbd97f9-on85257788.0002aac5-85257788.00065...@tatravelcenters.com>
thread-topic: Requested Information
thread-index: ActCYatDdxF4uzGMQ9iA9XjNGJDdRQ==
I Message-ID: <924972f2-c728-46b8-a6b9-3ca24c7ba...@nawilliams.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 20:21:59 -0500
T To: <stukus.da...@tatravelcenters.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MIME-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8A400)
X-Spam-Score: 12.8 (++++++++++++)
X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (12.8 points, 7.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
20 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail)
[SPF failed: Please see
http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;id=mmccutcheon%40nawilliams.com;ip=69.20.116.35;r=lnxsrv4.ta.com
]
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
0.0 MIME_QP_LONG_LINE RAW: Quoted-printable line longer than 76
chars
-5.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
