On 9-Mar-2010, at 06:50, Brian wrote:
>
> Postfix remains an MTA for the 1990's as it is, but that's just a view.
> If 9x% of the traffic an MTA gets to see is unwanted SPAM, it's not
> unreasonable to expect a solid and reliable built in mechanism to reject
> it.
My postfix rejects more than 90%
On 9-Mar-2010, at 05:51, Brian wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 13:17 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>> * Brian :
>>
>>> In the year 2010 it is not unreasonable to expect the MTA that takes
>>> responsibility for accepting a message to make reasonable checks about
>>> the validity or content of t
On 9-Mar-2010, at 02:45, Brian wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 02:36 -0700, LuKreme wrote:
>
>> On 08-Mar-10 23:51, Brian wrote:
>>> Yes, but that does not answer my question {and is once more Postfix
>>> biased} AFAIK Postfix is totally unable to reject mail at SMTP time that
>>> Spamassassin decide
