On 9-Mar-2010, at 02:45, Brian wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 02:36 -0700, LuKreme wrote:
>
>> On 08-Mar-10 23:51, Brian wrote:
>>> Yes, but that does not answer my question {and is once more Postfix
>>> biased} AFAIK Postfix is totally unable to reject mail at SMTP time that
>>> Spamassassin decides IS SPAM without the aid of a milter or policy
>>> deamon of some kind. Unless you know different?
>>
>> You don't let messages even GET to SA until they pass sane checks (like
>> reject_non_fqdn_sender and reject_non_fqdn_recipient).
>
> Which spam happily passes, hence the need for Spamassassin to do content
> inspection - unless you are telling me Postfix can offer the same level
> of content inspection as Spamassassin? (Clue: stock answer - 'Postfix
> is an MTA, it does not do......)
Please read the whole thread. We were talking about a specific threat, as
detailed in the subject.
--
"Send beer, words simply can't adequately express your gratitude" -- James
Sedgwick
