On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, MrGibbage wrote:
OK, Now I also get very different results, which seems to be inline with what
you two have seen.
http://pelorus.org/fourth_pass_log.txt
And while there are some small differences between the sub-tests that hit,
the overall score is still zero for my install
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, MrGibbage wrote:
BOTNET and the MEDS rule that was posted to the list recently help push
it over the spam threshold:
Is this the MEDS rule thread that you refer to?
http://www.nabble.com/-NEW-SPAM-FLOOD--www.shopXX.net-td24139422.html
That ruleset has bounced around seve
Is this the MEDS rule thread that you refer to?
http://www.nabble.com/-NEW-SPAM-FLOOD--www.shopXX.net-td24139422.html
Skip
John Wilcock wrote:
>
> Le 06/07/2009 14:22, RW a écrit :
>>> http://pelorus.org/spammy.txt
>>> >
>>
>> That's odd, I get MISSING_DATE, MISSING_HB_SEP, MISSING_HEADERS,
>
OK, Now I also get very different results, which seems to be inline with what
you two have seen.
http://pelorus.org/fourth_pass_log.txt
And while there are some small differences between the sub-tests that hit,
the overall score is still zero for my installation. So perhaps I just need
to tweak
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, John Wilcock wrote:
Le 06/07/2009 14:22, RW a écrit :
> http://pelorus.org/spammy.txt
That's odd, I get MISSING_DATE, MISSING_HB_SEP, MISSING_HEADERS,
MISSING_MID, MISSING_SUBJECT too, even though all the headers are there.
So do I until I get rid of the extraneous car
Le 06/07/2009 14:22, RW a écrit :
http://pelorus.org/spammy.txt
>
That's odd, I get MISSING_DATE, MISSING_HB_SEP, MISSING_HEADERS,
MISSING_MID, MISSING_SUBJECT too, even though all the headers are there.
So do I until I get rid of the extraneous carriage return in the
following received lin
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, RW wrote:
On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 19:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
MrGibbage wrote:
http://pelorus.org/spammy.txt
That's odd, I get MISSING_DATE, MISSING_HB_SEP, MISSING_HEADERS,
MISSING_MID, MISSING_SUBJECT too, even though all the headers are there.
Ditto.
Open a bug and attach the
On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 19:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
MrGibbage wrote:
>
> I thought I was careful and deleted all the headers that were
> added/altered after passing through my server and onto gmail. And I
> didn't see any erroneous blank lines. Perhaps I didn't do as good as
> I thought. Anyway, I did tr
I thought I was careful and deleted all the headers that were added/altered
after passing through my server and onto gmail. And I didn't see any
erroneous blank lines. Perhaps I didn't do as good as I thought. Anyway, I
did try it again, and here are the results:
http://pelorus.org/third_pass_
Hmmm... my SA installation is on the dreamhost server. I happened to just
just recently switch from bluehost though. Is there something in the
headers that makes you think my installation is on bluehost still? I did
copy most of the configuration files from my old bluehost server, so it
could b
On Mon, July 6, 2009 01:29, MrGibbage wrote:
> Hoping for some help,
whitelist all trusted senders in cpanel, and lover default kill score, so all
will get in quarantine if sender is not known in the
whitelist, or another way, get a bluehost.com postmaster to join this maillist
:)
--
xpoint
On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 16:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
MrGibbage wrote:
>
> What would cause my SA installation to score a message 0 every once
> in a while? Last night I received a spam message in my inbox, which
> is kinda strange since SA is pretty much foolproof for me. Upon
> further investigation, I fo
12 matches
Mail list logo
