OK, Now I also get very different results, which seems to be inline with what you two have seen.
http://pelorus.org/fourth_pass_log.txt And while there are some small differences between the sub-tests that hit, the overall score is still zero for my installation. So perhaps I just need to tweak some rules. John Hardin wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, John Wilcock wrote: > >> Le 06/07/2009 14:22, RW a écrit : >>> > http://pelorus.org/spammy.txt >>> >>> That's odd, I get MISSING_DATE, MISSING_HB_SEP, MISSING_HEADERS, >>> MISSING_MID, MISSING_SUBJECT too, even though all the headers are >>> there. >> >> So do I until I get rid of the extraneous carriage return in the >> following >> received line: >> >>> Received: from outbound-mail-324.bluehost.com >>> (outbound-mail-324.bluehost.com [67.222.55.5]) > > d'oh! Never mind the bugzilla recommendation. > > Where'd my eyedrops go...? > > -- > John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ > jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org > key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > USMC Rules of Gunfighting #9: Accuracy is relative: most combat > shooting standards will be more dependent on "pucker factor" than > the inherent accuracy of the gun. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Tomorrow: Robert Heinlein's 102nd birthday > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SA-scores-zero...-sometimes-tp24347925p24363611.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
