RE: SA marked message as ham

2005-05-26 Thread Ben Wylie
Because you don't have any rules enabled that hit it. I suggest turning on URIBL tests. I have them scored highly and a low threshold to flag spam as that is ok with my setup. I don't know whether the how high the default scores would take this. Three lists got: http://p.w8k.jumptothehighestpoint.

Re: SA marked message as ham

2005-05-26 Thread Matt Kettler
Tim Macrina wrote: > I'm pretty new to SA but my local.cf has the following entries > > skip_rbl_checks 0 > use_razor20 > use_dcc 0 > use_pyzor 0 > > I believe this means that I am not using any of the checks. Are these > features that need to be insta

RE: SA marked message as ham

2005-05-26 Thread Tim Macrina
se in addition/instead of? Thanks -Original Message- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 11:08 AM To: Tim Macrina Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: SA marked message as ham Tim Macrina wrote: > Can anyone explain to me as to why this mes

Re: SA marked message as ham

2005-05-26 Thread Matt Kettler
Tim Macrina wrote: > Can anyone explain to me as to why this message was marked as ham. > Thank you Because it didn't hit any rules. No hits = ham, and by default, autolearn as ham (IMO this is a bad thing, but the default SA ruleset doesn't have enough negative-scoring rules to use a negative lea