Re: Rule PTR != localhost

2009-09-06 Thread mouss
LuKreme a écrit : > On 3-Sep-2009, at 15:33, mouss wrote: >> check_helo_hostname_access hash:/etc/postfix/access_host > > If but this in my smtpd_helo_restrictions (with a warn_if_reject for > right now), but where in the smtpd_recipient_restrictions do you > recommend putting this? > >>

Re: Rule PTR != localhost

2009-09-03 Thread Clunk Werclick
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 23:33 +0200, mouss wrote: > Clunk Werclick a écrit : > > On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 01:36 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote: > >> On Thu, 03 Sep 2009, Clunk Werclick wrote: > >> > >>> I'm starting to see plenty of these and they are new to us: > >>> > >>> zgrep "address not listed" /var/lo

Re: Rule PTR != localhost

2009-09-03 Thread LuKreme
On 3-Sep-2009, at 15:33, mouss wrote: check_helo_hostname_access hash:/etc/postfix/access_host If but this in my smtpd_helo_restrictions (with a warn_if_reject for right now), but where in the smtpd_recipient_restrictions do you recommend putting this? check_reverse_client_h

Re: Rule PTR != localhost

2009-09-03 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009, John Hardin wrote: > On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, John Hardin wrote: > >> headerRDNS_LOCALHOST X-Spam-Relays-External =~ /^\[ >> ip=(?!127)\d+\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+ rdns=localhost(?:\.localdomain)? /i >> describe RDNS_LOCALHOST Sender's public rDNS is "localhost" >> >> It should be i

Re: Rule PTR != localhost

2009-09-03 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, John Hardin wrote: headerRDNS_LOCALHOST X-Spam-Relays-External =~ /^\[ ip=(?!127)\d+\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+ rdns=localhost(?:\.localdomain)? /i describe RDNS_LOCALHOST Sender's public rDNS is "localhost" It should be in the 3.3.0 release if I understand the autopublication

Re: Rule PTR != localhost

2009-09-03 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Sahil Tandon wrote: # Warning: UNTESTED! header LOCAL_RDNS X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted =~ /^[^\]]+ rdns=localhost /i describe LOCAL_RDNS bogus localhost rDNS scoreLOCAL_RDNS 10.0 Already in the sandbox at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox

Re: Rule PTR != localhost

2009-09-03 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009, Clunk Werclick wrote: > On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 09:46 -0600, LuKreme wrote: > > On 2-Sep-2009, at 23:19, Clunk Werclick wrote: > > > zgrep "address not listed" /var/log/mail.info > > > Sep 3 05:26:59 : warning: 222.252.239.56: address not listed for > > > hostname localhost

Re: Rule PTR != localhost

2009-09-03 Thread mouss
Clunk Werclick a écrit : > On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 01:36 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote: >> On Thu, 03 Sep 2009, Clunk Werclick wrote: >> >>> I'm starting to see plenty of these and they are new to us: >>> >>> zgrep "address not listed" /var/log/mail.info >>> Sep 3 05:26:59 : warning: 222.252.239.56:

Re: Rule PTR != localhost

2009-09-03 Thread LuKreme
On 3-Sep-2009, at 10:00, Clunk Werclick wrote: On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 09:46 -0600, LuKreme wrote: I believe the directive in postfix is reject_unknown_client_hostname. As I understand it, this will not implicitly block PTR = 'localhost' whilst leaving others alone. It may be possible in 2.6?? bu

Re: Rule PTR != localhost

2009-09-03 Thread Clunk Werclick
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 09:46 -0600, LuKreme wrote: > On 2-Sep-2009, at 23:19, Clunk Werclick wrote: > > zgrep "address not listed" /var/log/mail.info > > Sep 3 05:26:59 : warning: 222.252.239.56: address not listed for > > hostname localhost > > dig -x 222.252.239.56 > > > > ... > > ;; QUESTION

Re: Rule PTR != localhost

2009-09-03 Thread LuKreme
On 2-Sep-2009, at 23:19, Clunk Werclick wrote: zgrep "address not listed" /var/log/mail.info Sep 3 05:26:59 : warning: 222.252.239.56: address not listed for hostname localhost dig -x 222.252.239.56 ... ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;56.239.252.222.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR ;; ANSWER SECTION: 56.239.252

Re: Rule PTR != localhost

2009-09-03 Thread Mark Martinec
> > forgive me, why do you want all that crap into your spamassassin when > > postfix can solve it for you without a hick ? > > Obvious answer: not everyone who uses SA uses postfix. Another slightly less obvious: to let autolearning see what new crap it has to learn, and/or to check rules effecti

Re: Rule PTR != localhost

2009-09-03 Thread Clunk Werclick
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 16:00 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote: > On Thu 03 Sep 2009 03:05:50 PM CEST, Justin Mason wrote > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:18, Benny Pedersen wrote: > >> On Thu 03 Sep 2009 07:19:35 AM CEST, Clunk Werclick wrote > >>> Forgive the stupidity of the question, but I'm not sure how

Re: Rule PTR != localhost

2009-09-03 Thread Rick Macdougall
Benny Pedersen wrote: On Thu 03 Sep 2009 03:05:50 PM CEST, Justin Mason wrote On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:18, Benny Pedersen wrote: On Thu 03 Sep 2009 07:19:35 AM CEST, Clunk Werclick wrote Forgive the stupidity of the question, but I'm not sure how to, or even if it can be implemented? forgive

Re: Rule PTR != localhost

2009-09-03 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Thu 03 Sep 2009 03:05:50 PM CEST, Justin Mason wrote On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:18, Benny Pedersen wrote: On Thu 03 Sep 2009 07:19:35 AM CEST, Clunk Werclick wrote Forgive the stupidity of the question, but I'm not sure how to, or even if it can be implemented? forgive me, why do you want al

Re: Rule PTR != localhost

2009-09-03 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Clunk Werclick wrote: zgrep "address not listed" /var/log/mail.info Sep 3 05:26:59 : warning: 222.252.239.56: address not listed for hostname localhost dig -x 222.252.239.56 ... ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;56.239.252.222.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR ;; ANSWER SECTION: 56.239.252.222

Re: Rule PTR != localhost

2009-09-03 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> > On Thu 03 Sep 2009 07:19:35 AM CEST, Clunk Werclick wrote > >> Forgive the stupidity of the question, but I'm not sure how to, or even > >> if it can be implemented? > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:18, Benny Pedersen wrote: > > forgive me, why do you want all that crap into your spamassassin when

Re: Rule PTR != localhost

2009-09-03 Thread Justin Mason
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:18, Benny Pedersen wrote: > On Thu 03 Sep 2009 07:19:35 AM CEST, Clunk Werclick wrote > >> Forgive the stupidity of the question, but I'm not sure how to, or even >> if it can be implemented? > > forgive me, why do you want all that crap into your spamassassin when > postf

Re: Rule PTR != localhost

2009-09-03 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Thu 03 Sep 2009 07:19:35 AM CEST, Clunk Werclick wrote Forgive the stupidity of the question, but I'm not sure how to, or even if it can be implemented? forgive me, why do you want all that crap into your spamassassin when postfix can solve it for you without a hick ? -- xpoint

Re: Rule PTR != localhost

2009-09-03 Thread Matt Kettler
Clunk Werclick wrote: > On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 05:23 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote: > >> Clunk Werclick wrote: >> >>> Howdie; >>> >>> I'm starting to see plenty of these and they are new to us: >>> >>> zgrep "address not listed" /var/log/mail.info >>> Sep 3 05:26:59 : warning: 222.252.239.5

Re: Rule PTR != localhost

2009-09-03 Thread Clunk Werclick
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 05:23 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote: > Clunk Werclick wrote: > > Howdie; > > > > I'm starting to see plenty of these and they are new to us: > > > > zgrep "address not listed" /var/log/mail.info > > Sep 3 05:26:59 : warning: 222.252.239.56: address not listed for > > hostname

Re: Rule PTR != localhost

2009-09-03 Thread Matt Kettler
Matt Kettler wrote: > Clunk Werclick wrote: > >> Howdie; >> >> I'm starting to see plenty of these and they are new to us: >> >> zgrep "address not listed" /var/log/mail.info >> Sep 3 05:26:59 : warning: 222.252.239.56: address not listed for >> hostname localhost >> dig -x 222.252.239.56 >

Re: Rule PTR != localhost

2009-09-03 Thread Matt Kettler
Clunk Werclick wrote: > Howdie; > > I'm starting to see plenty of these and they are new to us: > > zgrep "address not listed" /var/log/mail.info > Sep 3 05:26:59 : warning: 222.252.239.56: address not listed for > hostname localhost > dig -x 222.252.239.56 > > ... > ;; QUESTION SECTION: > ;56

Re: Rule PTR != localhost

2009-09-03 Thread Clunk Werclick
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 01:36 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Thu, 03 Sep 2009, Clunk Werclick wrote: > > > I'm starting to see plenty of these and they are new to us: > > > > zgrep "address not listed" /var/log/mail.info > > Sep 3 05:26:59 : warning: 222.252.239.56: address not listed for > >

Re: Rule PTR != localhost

2009-09-02 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009, Clunk Werclick wrote: > I'm starting to see plenty of these and they are new to us: > > zgrep "address not listed" /var/log/mail.info > Sep 3 05:26:59 : warning: 222.252.239.56: address not listed for > hostname localhost > dig -x 222.252.239.56 > > ... > ;; QUESTION SE