On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 16:00 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote: > On Thu 03 Sep 2009 03:05:50 PM CEST, Justin Mason wrote > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:18, Benny Pedersen<m...@junc.org> wrote: > >> On Thu 03 Sep 2009 07:19:35 AM CEST, Clunk Werclick wrote > >>> Forgive the stupidity of the question, but I'm not sure how to, or even > >>> if it can be implemented? > >> forgive me, why do you want all that crap into your spamassassin when > >> postfix can solve it for you without a hick ? > > Obvious answer: not everyone who uses SA uses postfix. > > correct, but i only know postfix can fight this spam on its own, if > qmail, exim, sendmail or other mta can do this aswell, show me :) > Forgive Benny, he is a bit odd. The ability to sift connecting host by actual *hostname* (e.g. ptr = LOCALHOST) is native to Postfix 2.6. I believe it is entirely worthless in the 2.5 production servers many are running ?
Naturally if Benny is able to demonstrate how PTR != 'localhost' in Postfix 2.5 (with no side effects - just on that one meta) I would be delighted for him to share it. -- ----------------------------------------------------------- C Werclick .Lot Technical incompetent Loyal Order Of The Teapot. This e-mail and its attachments is intended only to be used as an e-mail and an attachment. Any use of it for other purposes other than as an e-mail and an attachment will not be covered by any warranty that may or may not form part of this e-mail and attachment.
