On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 09:53 -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> > it is *not* a bug. It's not SA's task to split a msg to multiple rcpts.
> > Your glue (hack) or MTA (best) should do this.
>
> It IS a bug since the software is not acting according to how it's
> documented or expected. That is the d
On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 15:20 -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> I take it by the:
>
> a) lack of usable responses
> b) responses NOT claiming this ISN'T a bug
> c) responses tacitly acknowledging this is an "Oh crap they forgot about
> BCCs when they wrote it but I don't have the balls to publicly ca
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
On 8/15/2013 12:14 AM, Axb wrote:
On 08/15/2013 12:20 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> I take it by the:
>
> a) lack of usable responses
> b) responses NOT claiming this ISN'T a bug
it is *not* a bug. It's not SA's task to split a msg to multip
On 8/15/13 11:53 AM, "Ted Mittelstaedt" wrote:
> On 8/15/2013 12:14 AM, Axb wrote:
>> On 08/15/2013 12:20 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>>
>>> I take it by the:
>>>
>>> a) lack of usable responses
>>> b) responses NOT claiming this ISN'T a bug
>>
>> it is *not* a bug. It's not SA's task to spl
On 8/15/2013 9:38 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 14.08.13 15:20, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
I am using spamass-milter to process received mail.
do you use "-u user" option? spamas-milter uses that user's config when the
mail goes to multiple recipients. Isn't that user by any chance the one
On 8/15/2013 12:14 AM, Axb wrote:
On 08/15/2013 12:20 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
I take it by the:
a) lack of usable responses
b) responses NOT claiming this ISN'T a bug
it is *not* a bug. It's not SA's task to split a msg to multiple rcpts.
Your glue (hack) or MTA (best) should do this.
On 8/15/2013 12:29 AM, Axb wrote:
On 08/15/2013 12:20 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Suggestions?
http://www.snertsoft.com/sendmail/milter-spamc/
Spam:recipient-address value * (FRIEND or HATER are recognised)
Spam:recipient-domain value * (FRIEND or HATER are recognised)
Spam:reci
On 14.08.13 15:20, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
I am using spamass-milter to process received mail.
do you use "-u user" option? spamas-milter uses that user's config when the
mail goes to multiple recipients. Isn't that user by any chance the one in
all_spam_to list?
I guess if you don't specify t
On 08/15/2013 12:20 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Suggestions?
http://www.snertsoft.com/sendmail/milter-spamc/
Spam:recipient-address value * (FRIEND or HATER are recognised)
Spam:recipient-domain value * (FRIEND or HATER are recognised)
Spam:recipient@ value * (FRIEND or HATE
On 08/15/2013 12:20 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
I take it by the:
a) lack of usable responses
b) responses NOT claiming this ISN'T a bug
it is *not* a bug. It's not SA's task to split a msg to multiple rcpts.
Your glue (hack) or MTA (best) should do this.
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, David B Funk wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
{snip}
Unfortunately it appears spamass-milter is hardcoded to scan at that point
in the process. I don't think there's much SA can do about it.
It's not so mu
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
1) WTF is pastebin? (not you, the other guy)
pastebin.com, a way to share files for public review. It's a far better way
to share spamples than posting them to the list, but be aware the files *do*
expire
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
1) WTF is pastebin? (not you, the other guy)
pastebin.com, a way to share files for public review. It's a far better
way to share spamples than posting them to the list, but be aware the
files *do* expire. Upload a spample to pastebin.com and pos
1) WTF is pastebin? (not you, the other guy)
2) This is mail received from the Internet for users on the mailserver.
Users on the mailserver transmit mail from their mail clients through a
completely different server
I am using spamass-milter to process received mail.
This is a Sendmail se
On 08/14/2013 08:08 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Hi All,
I'm having a lot of problem with spammers who are sending spams with
a To: of a user who is NOT in my all_spam_to list and a BCC: listing
a user IN the all_spam_list. Usually the BCC's list multiple users,
I guess on the theory that the
Ted Mittelstaedt skrev den 2013-08-14 20:08:
Suggestions?
pastebin ?
only local mta sees bcc, when its sent its removed
16 matches
Mail list logo
