On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 14:41 -0600, Neil Schwartzman wrote:
>
>
> On 17/07/09 4:03 PM, "Neil Schwartzman"
> wrote:
>
> > Your assertion that we encountered a block and then switched to a new IP
> > netblock is preposterous. We have several ranges and mail streams. You opted
> > in and then opted
On 17/07/09 4:03 PM, "Neil Schwartzman"
wrote:
> Your assertion that we encountered a block and then switched to a new IP
> netblock is preposterous. We have several ranges and mail streams. You opted
> in and then opted out. OK, in what timeframe? Minutes? Hours? The proscribed
> 10-day CANSP
On 17/07/09 3:32 PM, "rich...@buzzhost.co.uk"
wrote:
> I have (as usual) a different view. Being told how wonderful they were I
> thought it would be a blast to opt-in, then opt out again. On opting out
> I found I was mailed again by RP. So I blocked the range. They found
> another range and spa
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 03:25 -0700, twofers wrote:
> Neil Rocks !
>
> Thanks Neil.
>
> Wes
>
> --- On Thu, 7/16/09, Neil Schwartzman
> wrote:
>
>
> From: Neil Schwartzman
> Subject: Re: Opt In Spam
> To: "twofers
FOLLOW-UP:
A process was hung on one of the 20 hives serving the whitelists and
reported this IP as being listed. We've restarted the process and it is
no longer reporting incorrectly.
On 16/07/09 8:05 AM, "Neil Schwartzman" wrote:
Now, I am aware that we recently changed the DNS hives serving
On 16-Jul-2009, at 05:38, twofers wrote:
* -4.3 HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI RBL: Habeas Accredited Opt-In
or Better
* [66.59.8.161 listed in sa-accredit.habeas.com]
If you search for HABEAS_ACCREDITED you will find that a LOT of admins
either drop these scores to very low nu
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 07:55 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Have you reported the abuse to mailto:habeas@abuse.net, as Neil
> Schwartzman from Return Path (operators of Habeas) requested last time?
>
> Just posting to the sa-users list isn't really going to do very much.
Have to agree (it's nice
On 16/07/09 7:38 AM, "twofers" wrote:
> And yet another SPAM from these opt-in guys.
SINGLE opt-in (SOI).
> I believe this group are nothing but covert Spammers abusing a privilage
> afforded them.
Which group? E Z Publishing? They are neither covert, nor spammers. They are
an ESP. As suc
Have you reported the abuse to mailto:habeas@abuse.net, as Neil
Schwartzman from Return Path (operators of Habeas) requested last time?
Just posting to the sa-users list isn't really going to do very much. If
there are pervasive FP problems, it will show up in the mass-checks and
we'll drop th
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 04:38 -0700, twofers wrote:
> 66.59.8.161
TRY:
OrgAbuseEmail: ab...@streamsend.com
10 matches
Mail list logo
