On 04/09/2015 12:14 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
if you are trying to retrofit registrarboundaries.pm onto older SA
releases, you'll need to follow the instructions on the older PM file
from your install or a previous SVN commit.
In 3.4.1, registrarboundaries will be updatable via a cf file deliv
--Original Message-
> From: Kevin A. McGrail [mailto:kmcgr...@pccc.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 2:14 PM
> To: Kevin Miller; 'Alex Regan'; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Mail Filter Recommendations
>
> if you are trying to retrofit registrarboundari
if you are trying to retrofit registrarboundaries.pm onto older SA
releases, you'll need to follow the instructions on the older PM file
from your install or a previous SVN commit.
In 3.4.1, registrarboundaries will be updatable via a cf file delivered
by sa-update so we no longer need to main
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Regan [mailto:mysqlstud...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 2:35 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Mail Filter Recommendations
> Select the download link here:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spa
On Tue, 07 Apr 2015 18:35:14 -0400
Alex Regan wrote:
> I think the reason it didn't match on anything useful for the OP is
> because he doesn't have the latest RegisterBoundaries.pm.
>
> If he had the latest, it would have at least matched the MSGID and
> MALFORMED rules.
These two rules don'
On 2015-04-07 17:35, Alex Regan wrote:
Hi,
I think the reason it didn't match on anything useful for the OP is
because he doesn't have the latest RegisterBoundaries.pm.
If he had the latest, it would have at least matched the MSGID and
MALFORMED rules.
Select the download link here:
http://s
Hi,
Here's a couple of example spams that are the kind which are slipping
through constantly. Some of the them get caught, others do not.
http://pastebin.com/UH5BA6zs
http://pastebin.com/esEz1a4J
Neither of those is matching on much of anything useful
a well trained bayes would catch both
Am 07.04.2015 um 22:35 schrieb Bowie Bailey:
On 4/7/2015 3:07 PM, Asai wrote:
Thanks, Bowie and Noel,
Here's a couple of example spams that are the kind which are slipping
through constantly. Some of the them get caught, others do not.
http://pastebin.com/UH5BA6zs
http://pastebin.com/esEz1a
On 4/7/2015 3:07 PM, Asai wrote:
Thanks, Bowie and Noel,
Here's a couple of example spams that are the kind which are slipping
through constantly. Some of the them get caught, others do not.
http://pastebin.com/UH5BA6zs
http://pastebin.com/esEz1a4J
Neither of those is matching on much of a
On 4/7/2015 2:07 PM, Asai wrote:
> Thanks, Bowie and Noel,
>
> Here's a couple of example spams that are the kind which are
> slipping through constantly. Some of the them get caught, others
> do not.
>
> http://pastebin.com/UH5BA6zs
> http://pastebin.com/esEz1a4J
Do you have a reasonably current
Thanks, Bowie and Noel,
Here's a couple of example spams that are the kind which are slipping
through constantly. Some of the them get caught, others do not.
http://pastebin.com/UH5BA6zs
http://pastebin.com/esEz1a4J
Also, could you offer some guidance on how to set up scanning /per user/
fo
On 4/6/2015 11:47 PM, Noel wrote:
On 4/6/2015 10:08 PM, Asai wrote:
Greetings,
We've been using Amavis for a number of years, but it seems to not
be doing what we need it to be doing regarding spam filtering.
e.g. I can't seem to get it to learn bayes data on a per user
basis. We have our spam
On 4/6/2015 10:08 PM, Asai wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> We've been using Amavis for a number of years, but it seems to not
> be doing what we need it to be doing regarding spam filtering.
> e.g. I can't seem to get it to learn bayes data on a per user
> basis. We have our spam filters turned up so hig
13 matches
Mail list logo
