On 4/7/2015 2:07 PM, Asai wrote: > Thanks, Bowie and Noel, > > Here's a couple of example spams that are the kind which are > slipping through constantly. Some of the them get caught, others > do not. > > http://pastebin.com/UH5BA6zs > http://pastebin.com/esEz1a4J
Do you have a reasonably current version of SpamAssassin installed? Updated the ruleset recently? > > Also, could you offer some guidance on how to set up scanning /per > user/ for Bayes data with Amavis running at the same time? Regardless of whether you use a site-wide or per-user bayes, it must be trained. A well trained site-wide bayes is usually quite effective if your users (mostly) agree on what is and isn't spam. If per-user bayes is a requirement, something other than amavisd-new may be more appropriate, but you'll lose the features and efficiencies of amavisd-new. You get to decide that for yourself.
