On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 17:32:05 -0400
Chris Conn wrote:
> In a followup to
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/151470;
>
> Is it possible to set the priority on RBL rules to run after rules,
> or not at all if shortcircuited?
RBL test are done in parallel, and they are init
In a followup to
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/151470;
Is it possible to set the priority on RBL rules to run after rules, or
not at all if shortcircuited?
I tried:
priority RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET -300
priority RCVD_IN_XBL -300
priority RCVD_IN_PSBL -300
priority R
Hi,
>> What would be involved with making the PSBL DNSBL work with v3.2.5?
>
> Alex, I'm pretty sure that you are already using PSBL through my
> khop-bl channel, which adds PSBL, BRBL, Spam-eating Monkey (SEMBLACK),
> HostKarma/JunkEmailFilter, and, more recently, MSPIKE (as per a
> request from
Alex wrote:
> What would be involved with making the PSBL DNSBL work with v3.2.5?
Alex, I'm pretty sure that you are already using PSBL through my
khop-bl channel, which adds PSBL, BRBL, Spam-eating Monkey (SEMBLACK),
HostKarma/JunkEmailFilter, and, more recently, MSPIKE (as per a
request from Joã
Hi,
- "Alex" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Anyway, it'll soon be deprecated in favor of 20_aux_tlds.cf, which
> is
> > part of the stock rule-set since 3.3.1. Bug 6361. As mentioned in
> the
> > release announcement.
>
> Is the 20_aux_tlds.cf stable and available for use to replace it now?
>
> Will
Alex wrote:
Will the new RBLs in v3.3.1 ever be available/compatible with v3.2.5?
What would be involved with making the PSBL DNSBL work with v3.2.5?
You can certainly add additional RBLs to 3.2.5. For example:
# PSBL easy-on, easy-off blacklist: http://psbl.surriel.com
header RCVD_IN_PSBL
Hi,
> Anyway, it'll soon be deprecated in favor of 20_aux_tlds.cf, which is
> part of the stock rule-set since 3.3.1. Bug 6361. As mentioned in the
> release announcement.
Is the 20_aux_tlds.cf stable and available for use to replace it now?
Will the new RBLs in v3.3.1 ever be available/compatib
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 14:44 -0400, Kris Deugau wrote:
> [...] that should save a little CPU time because I dropped the SARE
> 90_2tld channel for 3.3.x
The CPU time saved by dropping that file is negligible, hardly
measurable.
Anyway, it'll soon be deprecated in favor of 20_aux_tlds.cf, which is
On 24/03/2010 4:09 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
Michael Scheidell wrote:
several more RBL's,
check your dns performance?
Looks like the new PSBL DNSBL is a bit slow. I wonder if the new load
from SA 3.3 is the cause?
A quick walk through the SA log shows it isn't helping much here, so
I've disable
Michael Scheidell wrote:
several more RBL's,
check your dns performance?
Looks like the new PSBL DNSBL is a bit slow. I wonder if the new load
from SA 3.3 is the cause?
A quick walk through the SA log shows it isn't helping much here, so
I've disabled it locally.
I checked out their rs
On 24/03/2010 2:40 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 3/24/10 2:23 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Hi,
Any one have any idea what might cause an increase of scan times when
going from 3.3 to 3.3.1.
I've upgraded one server and the average scan time is now 4.3 seconds.
The 3 other servers still runn
On 24/03/2010 2:40 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 3/24/10 2:23 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Hi,
Any one have any idea what might cause an increase of scan times when
going from 3.3 to 3.3.1.
I've upgraded one server and the average scan time is now 4.3 seconds.
The 3 other servers still runn
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Any one have any idea what might cause an increase of scan times when
going from 3.3 to 3.3.1.
I've upgraded one server and the average scan time is now 4.3 seconds.
The 3 other servers still running 3.3 average 1.38
All running Centos on exactly the same hardware.
(I
On 3/24/10 2:23 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Hi,
Any one have any idea what might cause an increase of scan times when
going from 3.3 to 3.3.1.
I've upgraded one server and the average scan time is now 4.3 seconds.
The 3 other servers still running 3.3 average 1.38
several more RBL's,
chec
14 matches
Mail list logo
