Brian C. Huffman wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
You are running the latest version of amavisd, correct? I know for
*sure* that a milter must fake a received header before passing the
message to SA and I'm 99.9% sure that it was amavisd that wasn't doing
this only a couple of months ago.
I
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
>
>You are running the latest version of amavisd, correct? I know for
>*sure* that a milter must fake a received header before passing the
>message to SA and I'm 99.9% sure that it was amavisd that wasn't doing
>this only a couple of months ago.
I am running the lates
[back on list]
Brian C. Huffman wrote:
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 16:55 -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Brian C. Huffman wrote:
Looking through /usr/sbin/amavisd, it appears that it *does not* add the
Received header if it is called via a milter (which it is). So, this wouldn't
seem to be the
Brian C. Huffman wrote:
Looking through /usr/sbin/amavisd, it appears that it *does not* add the
Received header if it is called via a milter (which it is). So, this wouldn't
seem to be the issue.
New versions do. The old versions that don't are broken and have
greater issues (most DNSBL
- Original Message -
From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tue, 1/23/2007 4:11pm
To: Brian C. Huffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: INVALID_TZ_EST flagged in all emails
>
> It sounds like it may be an issue with t
Brian C. Huffman wrote:
All,
I've searched but can not find the answer to this. I'm running RedHat
Enterprise Linux v4 with all latest updates and am using the
amavisd-milter to call amavisd-new (v2.4.4) which in turn is using spamd
(spamassassin v3.1.7). It appears that every single email
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 01:04:24PM -0500, Brian C. Huffman wrote:
> I'm running RedHat Enterprise Linux v4 with all latest updates and am using
> the amavisd-milter to call amavisd-new (v2.4.4) which in turn is using spamd
> (spamassassin v3.1.7). It appears that every single email that's gettin
