Bill McCormick wrote:
Bill McCormick wrote:
Bill McCormick wrote:
I switched from using a RulesDeJour update script to sa-update. I'm no
longer getting hits on these geocites spams. Anybody know which sare
rule I need to add?
I found and load the WebRedirect Plugin:
http://wiki.apache.org/
Bill McCormick wrote:
Bill McCormick wrote:
I switched from using a RulesDeJour update script to sa-update. I'm no
longer getting hits on these geocites spams. Anybody know which sare
rule I need to add?
I found and load the WebRedirect Plugin:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/WebRedirect
Bill McCormick wrote:
I switched from using a RulesDeJour update script to sa-update. I'm no
longer getting hits on these geocites spams. Anybody know which sare
rule I need to add?
I found and load the WebRedirect Plugin:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/WebRedirectPlugin
Can anybody tel
On Tuesday, November 15, 2005, 3:47:22 PM, Loren Wilton wrote:
>> Unfortunately, I've had plenty of FPs with the basic *.geocities.com.. A
> lot of
>> "enthusiast" websites of various sorts are hosted there and my users like
> to
>> forward around links to them.
> I wonder what the effect of listi
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> List Mail User wrote:
>> Of course, the originals transmogrify quite quickly and the '/?'
>> was posted a couple of days ago.
>
> Actually it was posted a couple weeks ago. About two or three days
> later I started to get spams without the query string. The rule
>...
>List Mail User wrote:
>> Of course, the originals transmogrify quite quickly and the '/?'
>> was posted a couple of days ago.
>
>Actually it was posted a couple weeks ago. About two or three days
>later I started to get spams without the query string. The rule worked
>well for a few
List Mail User wrote:
Of course, the originals transmogrify quite quickly and the '/?'
was posted a couple of days ago.
Actually it was posted a couple weeks ago. About two or three days
later I started to get spams without the query string. The rule worked
well for a few weeks befo
>...
>> Unfortunately, I've had plenty of FPs with the basic *.geocities.com.. A
>lot of
>> "enthusiast" websites of various sorts are hosted there and my users like
>to
>> forward around links to them.
>
>I wonder what the effect of listing /\w\.\w\w\.geocities\.com\b/ would be?
>That would only c
Matt Kettler wrote:
> mouss wrote:
>
>>Matt Kettler a écrit :
>>
>>
>>>mouss wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
They used other geocities sites since a long time. I just score 4 for
any "*.geocities.com/*/?" URLs. for now, I have no FN, no FP.
>>>
>>>
>>>Unfortunately, I've had plenty of FPs with
mouss wrote:
> Matt Kettler a écrit :
>
>> mouss wrote:
>>
>>
>>> They used other geocities sites since a long time. I just score 4 for
>>> any "*.geocities.com/*/?" URLs. for now, I have no FN, no FP.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Unfortunately, I've had plenty of FPs with the basic *.geocities.com..
>
> Y
Matt Kettler a écrit :
mouss wrote:
They used other geocities sites since a long time. I just score 4 for
any "*.geocities.com/*/?" URLs. for now, I have no FN, no FP.
Unfortunately, I've had plenty of FPs with the basic *.geocities.com..
You may have missed the "/?" part. I don't
> Unfortunately, I've had plenty of FPs with the basic *.geocities.com.. A
lot of
> "enthusiast" websites of various sorts are hosted there and my users like
to
> forward around links to them.
I wonder what the effect of listing /\w\.\w\w\.geocities\.com\b/ would be?
That would only catch the non-
mouss wrote:
>
> They used other geocities sites since a long time. I just score 4 for
> any "*.geocities.com/*/?" URLs. for now, I have no FN, no FP.
Unfortunately, I've had plenty of FPs with the basic *.geocities.com.. A lot of
"enthusiast" websites of various sorts are hosted there and my use
Evan Platt a écrit :
I run my own site, so my site, my rules... But looking through my
archived mail for uk.geoc1ties.com, I see NO legit mail.
I'm at the point of adding a body_check rule in postfix to /dev/null
anything with the above in the body. I see now they've started to use
de.geoc
At 12:43 PM 11/15/2005, you wrote:
This is a collection of various geocities rules that I've been
using. You might
want to run them by a corpus to see what their FPs are like for you,
but this is
a good starting point. These are based on rules posted by others on the list,
with a few limited ha
Jeff Chan wrote:
> Does anyone have a geocities rule that catches most of the spams
> and has few FPs?
This is a collection of various geocities rules that I've been using. You might
want to run them by a corpus to see what their FPs are like for you, but this is
a good starting point. These are
At 01:18 14/11/2005, mouss wrote:
Jeff Chan a écrit :
Does anyone have a geocities rule that catches most of the spams
and has few FPs?
after looking at many of these, I ended up just
giving 4 points to any
http://*.geocities.com/*/? (written as perl expression of course).
together with Baye
From: "mouss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jeff Chan a écrit :
Does anyone have a geocities rule that catches most of the spams
and has few FPs?
after looking at many of these, I ended up just giving 4 points to any
http://*.geocities.com/*/? (written as perl expression of course).
together with Baye
>...
>Does anyone have a geocities rule that catches most of the spams
>and has few FPs?
>
>Cheers,
>
>Jeff C.
>--
>Jeff Chan
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://www.surbl.org/
>
Do you want to block the general drug spam, the "SoftTab"/ED spam,
the porn, the penis enhancers or the stock pum
Jeff Chan a écrit :
Does anyone have a geocities rule that catches most of the spams
and has few FPs?
after looking at many of these, I ended up just giving 4 points to any
http://*.geocities.com/*/? (written as perl expression of course).
together with Bayes and other tests, this seems to b
I've recently gave up on geocities alltogether and wrote a simple rule to give any mail coming from it a high score.
AFAIK, my users never get any legit mail from geocities anyway. I'm sure it'll generate FPs to other people.On 11/13/05, Jeff Chan <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Does anyone have a geoc
21 matches
Mail list logo
