Hi Kärsten,
Thanks for you message -
for daily work I'm providing a lot of IT and PC support, including some
network admin tasks.
But about messaging I don't know much, as everyone here obviously has
understood.
The problem with false spam alerts has been since times and now finally
friends fro
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
...using FuzzyOCR with score of 5.0 _AND_ changing score of BAYES_00 to
-1 is I'd say WORSE than using something they do not know...
send my (our) greetings to them...
+1. And if you can provide coordinates I'll warm up the anvil array.
--
On 28-Jan-2009, at 05:33, Rops wrote:
I'm an end user trying to figure out, why too many messages arrive
erratically stamped as spam.
Please could anyone explain, why the normally looking ordinary daily
business mail was classified as Spam?
Sure. Your system has a OCR scan of images (Optical C
Rops schrieb:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
> As I am not a server admin myself, I don't have access to any filter
> settings.
> Also in global servers, there isn't any admin available to talk or complain
> about problems :-(
thats your problem, change your email provider
>
> But it l
On 28.01.09 11:31, Rops wrote:
> Thanks for all your replies. That is exactly, what I wanted to know.
> "Locally global" ISP's don't have much of competition and can afford
> themselves providing a bad service and no customer support at all.
>
> I would like to be able to undersand spam filtering
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 11:31 -0800, Roberta wrote:
> Thanks for all your replies. That is exactly, what I wanted to know.
> "Locally global" ISP's don't have much of competition and can afford
> themselves providing a bad service and no customer support at all.
>
> I would like to be able to unders
Hello,
Thanks for all your replies. That is exactly, what I wanted to know.
"Locally global" ISP's don't have much of competition and can afford
themselves providing a bad service and no customer support at all.
I would like to be able to undersand spam filtering results from arriving
email head
Rops wrote on Wed, 28 Jan 2009 06:37:20 -0800 (PST):
> But it looks very much that Spam assassin does more harm then helps people.
It is not a matter of SA. Your sysadmin at estpak has tweaked the SA settings
away from the default settings. And he installed that third-party FUZZY_OCR
plugin whi
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 06:37 -0800, Roberta wrote:
>
> As I am not a server admin myself, I don't have access to any filter
> settings.
> Also in global servers, there isn't any admin available to talk or complain
> about problems :-(
>
> But it looks very much that Spam assassin does more harm t
Hi,
I'm an end user and don't have any acces to filter settings and there is
noone else reachable to ask why things are wrong like this, but friendly
members of this forum.
Thank anyway
Best Regards,
Roberta
RW-15 wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:33:40 -0800 (PST)
> Rops wrote:
>
>>
>>
Hi Robert,
Thanks for your reply.
As I am not a server admin myself, I don't have access to any filter
settings.
Also in global servers, there isn't any admin available to talk or complain
about problems :-(
But it looks very much that Spam assassin does more harm then helps people.
As there sel
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:33:40 -0800 (PST)
Rops wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm an end user trying to figure out, why too many messages arrive
> erratically stamped as spam.
> Please could anyone explain, why the normally looking ordinary daily
> business mail was classified as Spam?
>
> X-Spam-Statu
Rops schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> I'm an end user trying to figure out, why too many messages arrive
> erratically stamped as spam.
> Please could anyone explain, why the normally looking ordinary daily
> business mail was classified as Spam?
>
> Thank you!
look this line
amavisd-new at estpak.ee
loo
13 matches
Mail list logo