On Sun, 06 Dec 2015 09:28:08 +0100
Torsten Bronger wrote:
> Hallöchen!
>
> Bill Cole writes:
>
> > [...]
> >
> > Indicates that someone has sabotaged your SA scores. Those are
> > entirely insane scores for those tests. If the default values were
> > used, that message would not have been miscla
Am 06.12.2015 um 09:28 schrieb Torsten Bronger:
And don't trust whoever set your BAYES and RAZOR scores to have
anything to do with your spam control.
Well, I don't trust Razor anymore! If there is such a thing as "the
opposite of spam", then these mails.
nonsense, hence this is a scoring
Hallöchen!
Bill Cole writes:
> [...]
>
> Indicates that someone has sabotaged your SA scores. Those are
> entirely insane scores for those tests. If the default values were
> used, that message would not have been misclassified.
I myself set those values, almost 10 years ago. They have served
v
On 5 Dec 2015, at 14:46, Torsten Bronger wrote:
Hallöchen!
Bill Cole writes:
On 5 Dec 2015, at 4:42, Torsten Bronger wrote:
In http://wilson.bronger.org/37196
Nope:
Sorry, works now.
This:
-5.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
Hallöchen!
Bill Cole writes:
> On 5 Dec 2015, at 4:42, Torsten Bronger wrote:
>
>> In http://wilson.bronger.org/37196
>
> Nope:
Sorry, works now.
Tschö,
Torsten.
--
Torsten BrongerJabber ID: torsten.bron...@jabber.rwth-aachen.de
On 5 Dec 2015, at 4:42, Torsten Bronger wrote:
> Hallöchen!
>
> In http://wilson.bronger.org/37196
Nope:
* Trying 176.199.175.106...
* Connected to wilson.bronger.org (176.199.175.106) port 80 (#0)
> GET /37196 HTTP/1.1
> Host: wilson.bronger.org
> User-Agent: curl/7.45.0
> Accept: */*
>
< HT