On Thu, 26 May 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.05.2016 um 18:18 schrieb John Hardin:
On Fri, 13 May 2016, RW wrote:
> On Fri, 13 May 2016 15:42:07 +0200
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> > WTF - Received: from daves-air.home ([1.125.7.92]) is another time a
> > DEEP HEADER Inspection -
>
>
Am 13.05.2016 um 18:18 schrieb John Hardin:
On Fri, 13 May 2016, RW wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2016 15:42:07 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
WTF - Received: from daves-air.home ([1.125.7.92]) is another time a
DEEP HEADER Inspection -
This looks like a simple mistake rather than a deliberate attemp
On Sat, 14 May 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.05.2016 um 19:10 schrieb John Hardin:
On Sat, 14 May 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 14.05.2016 um 04:50 schrieb John Hardin:
> > On Sat, 14 May 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > > Am 14.05.2016 um 04:04 schrieb John Hardin:
> > > >How wou
Am 14.05.2016 um 19:10 schrieb John Hardin:
On Sat, 14 May 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.05.2016 um 04:50 schrieb John Hardin:
On Sat, 14 May 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 14.05.2016 um 04:04 schrieb John Hardin:
> > How would a webservice be better? That would still be sending >
>
On Sat, 14 May 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.05.2016 um 04:50 schrieb John Hardin:
On Sat, 14 May 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 14.05.2016 um 04:04 schrieb John Hardin:
> > How would a webservice be better? That would still be sending
> > customer
> > emails to a third party for
Am 14.05.2016 um 04:50 schrieb John Hardin:
On Sat, 14 May 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.05.2016 um 04:04 schrieb John Hardin:
How would a webservice be better? That would still be sending customer
emails to a third party for processing.
uhm you missed "and only give the rules which hi
On Sat, 14 May 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.05.2016 um 04:04 schrieb John Hardin:
On Fri, 13 May 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
> i can't rsync customer mails to a 3rd party
You don't have to. You run the masscheck locally and only upload the
rule hit results. I upload my corpora because
Am 14.05.2016 um 04:04 schrieb John Hardin:
On Fri, 13 May 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
i can't rsync customer mails to a 3rd party
You don't have to. You run the masscheck locally and only upload the
rule hit results. I upload my corpora because they are just my email and
are thus tiny.
If y
On Fri, 13 May 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.05.2016 um 18:11 schrieb John Hardin:
On Fri, 13 May 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
> the problem is blowing out such rules with such scores at all with a
> non working auto-QA (non-working in: no correction for days as well as
> dangerous scori
Am 13.05.2016 um 23:08 schrieb Tom Hendrikx:
On 13-05-16 18:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
especially you would not have much from the bayes-samples because they
would trigger all sort of wrong rules after strip most headers and and a
generic received header (which seems to be needed by the bayes-en
On 13-05-16 18:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 13.05.2016 um 18:11 schrieb John Hardin:
>> On Fri, 13 May 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>> the problem is blowing out such rules with such scores at all with a
>>> non working auto-QA (non-working in: no correction for days as well as
>>> dangerous
Am 13.05.2016 um 18:11 schrieb John Hardin:
On Fri, 13 May 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
the problem is blowing out such rules with such scores at all with a
non working auto-QA (non-working in: no correction for days as well as
dangerous scoring of new rules from the start)
02-Mai-2016 00:12:34
On Fri, 13 May 2016, RW wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2016 15:42:07 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
WTF - Received: from daves-air.home ([1.125.7.92]) is another time a
DEEP HEADER Inspection -
This looks like a simple mistake rather than a deliberate attempt at a
deep check. You should file a bug report
On Fri, 13 May 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
the problem is blowing out such rules with such scores at all with a non
working auto-QA (non-working in: no correction for days as well as dangerous
scoring of new rules from the start)
02-Mai-2016 00:12:34: SpamAssassin: No update available
03-Mai-2
Am 13.05.2016 um 16:25 schrieb RW:
On Fri, 13 May 2016 15:42:07 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
WTF - Received: from daves-air.home ([1.125.7.92]) is another time a
DEEP HEADER Inspection -
This looks like a simple mistake rather than a deliberate attempt at a
deep check. You should file a bug r
On Fri, 13 May 2016 15:42:07 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> WTF - Received: from daves-air.home ([1.125.7.92]) is another time a
> DEEP HEADER Inspection -
This looks like a simple mistake rather than a deliberate attempt at a
deep check. You should file a bug report.
Am 13.05.2016 um 15:42 schrieb Reindl Harald:
WTF - Received: from daves-air.home ([1.125.7.92]) is another time a
DEEP HEADER Inspection - What about score not well thought rules which
are even not worth a decription not higher than 0.5?
3.7 FSL_HELO_HOME No description available
sco
17 matches
Mail list logo
