On Fri, 13 May 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
the problem is blowing out such rules with such scores at all with a non
working auto-QA (non-working in: no correction for days as well as dangerous
scoring of new rules from the start)
02-Mai-2016 00:12:34: SpamAssassin: No update available
03-Mai-2016 01:55:05: SpamAssassin: No update available
04-Mai-2016 00:43:33: SpamAssassin: No update available
05-Mai-2016 01:48:15: SpamAssassin: Update processed successfully
06-Mai-2016 00:53:17: SpamAssassin: No update available
07-Mai-2016 01:21:23: SpamAssassin: No update available
08-Mai-2016 01:38:23: SpamAssassin: No update available
09-Mai-2016 00:02:56: SpamAssassin: No update available
10-Mai-2016 01:10:29: SpamAssassin: No update available
11-Mai-2016 00:55:46: SpamAssassin: No update available
12-Mai-2016 00:21:17: SpamAssassin: Update processed successfully
13-Mai-2016 00:33:31: SpamAssassin: No update available
Perhaps you could help with that by participating in masscheck. You seem
to get a lot of FPs on base rules; contributing masscheck results on your
ham would reduce those.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
...much of our country's counterterrorism security spending is not
designed to protect us from the terrorists, but instead to protect
our public officials from criticism when another attack occurs.
-- Bruce Schneier
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
143 days since the first successful real return to launch site (SpaceX)
