On Dienstag, 15. Dezember 2009 Marc Perkel wrote:
> Get a modern email client.
While I *can* read HTML with my client, I set *text* to be the default
view, as it's usually more readable.
It's really a very simple setting to send at least *both* html *and*
text. I'd prefer text only, to save th
In article <4b22a350.1030...@perkel.com>, Marc Perkel
writes
>
>Kevin Golding wrote:
>
>> bigfootinteractive.com. 3600IN TXT "v=spf1
>> ip4:206.132.3.0/24 ip4:206.132.1.0/24 ip4:216.35.62.0/25
>> ip4:216.33.63.0/24 ip4:209.67.13.128/25 ip4:66.7.58.0/24 -all"
>
From: "LuKreme"
Sent: Tuesday, 2009/December/15 07:19
On 15-Dec-2009, at 06:11, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Mark, can you *please* stop sending HTML-only messages to the list?
And just in case the response is "no one else complains"
Yes. Stop doing this. Bad list subscriber. Bad! Bad!
Very much
Marc Perkel wrote on Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:22:44 -0800:
> Get a modern email client.
Please stop responding like an asshole. This is not a matter about my
email client but about *you* configuring *your* email client incorrectly!
Please configure your email client correctly! Thank you.
Kai
--
Ka
Marc Perkel wrote:
> Get a modern email client.
>
Note that Kai didn't complain about the HTML, he comaplained that you're
_only_ sending the HTML. You should really send the text-portion along
too.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
On tir 15 dec 2009 17:36:56 CET, Toni Mueller wrote
HTML in emails is usually a synonym for "F*CKING SH*T".
most users that try doing it is maybe just trying to write in red or white :)
but yes, i will also say html is not for email, but so many clients
have it as default i have giving up wi
Hi,
On Tue, 15.12.2009 at 08:22:44 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Get a modern email client.
>
> Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>> Mark, can you *please* stop sending HTML-only messages to the list?
looks like I should start blacklisting individual subscribers.
HTML in emails is usually a synonym for "F*CKI
On tir 15 dec 2009 17:22:44 CET, Marc Perkel wrote
Mark, can you *please* stop sending HTML-only messages to the list?
Get a modern email client.
helps more to get a better os :)
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Get a modern email client.
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Mark, can you *please* stop sending HTML-only messages to the list?
Kai
On 15-Dec-2009, at 06:11, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Mark, can you *please* stop sending HTML-only messages to the list?
And just in case the response is "no one else complains"
Yes. Stop doing this. Bad list subscriber. Bad! Bad!
--
Hello Diane, I'm Bucky Goldstein
Mark, can you *please* stop sending HTML-only messages to the list?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Kevin Golding wrote:
In article <4b226758.90...@perkel.com>, Marc Perkel
writes
If you have any other domain names for me to list let me know. I'm
always looking to expand my white lists.
shop.marksandspencer.com is one I always see hitting black, and
SPF_HELO_
In article <4b226758.90...@perkel.com>, Marc Perkel
writes
>If you have any other domain names for me to list let me know. I'm
>always looking to expand my white lists.
shop.marksandspencer.com is one I always see hitting black, and
SPF_HELO_PASS so...
shop.marksandspencer.com. 86400 IN
Michael Monnerie wrote:
On Dienstag, 1. Dezember 2009 Marc Perkel wrote:
Every list is imperfect. In this case there were about 10 hits on the
hi MX record and they didn't use QUIT to close the connection.
Generally this indicates a virus. If they had used QUIT they
wouldn't h
On Montag, 30. November 2009 Alex wrote:
> I've been thinking the same thing for a while, but still have it
> enabled and scored low, particularly the whitelist.
>
> How do you think it compares with the Barracuda or Adam Katz lists?
>
> I have a small script that parses my mail log for JMF_BL, a
On Dienstag, 1. Dezember 2009 Marc Perkel wrote:
> Every list is imperfect. In this case there were about 10 hits on the
> hi MX record and they didn't use QUIT to close the connection.
> Generally this indicates a virus. If they had used QUIT they
> wouldn't have been listed. Although I try to
>
> if it was just for me you would post it on maillists ? :)
>
> thanks for clearify it, atleast for me
>
Benny,
sure we would! as ummm ...well, you know, you are just so lovable... :-)
seriously, and the reason you are so lovable is that even if i read some
(not all) of your posts over
On tir 01 dec 2009 12:27:58 CET, Mike Cardwell wrote
When I say, "you," I'm refering to the people using the JMF lists,
not specifically you Benny.
if it was just for me you would post it on maillists ? :)
thanks for clearify it, atleast for me
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-har
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On tir 01 dec 2009 02:16:04 CET, wrote
I believe Raymond's response was addressing the fact a server
connection could possibly be interrupted before it had a chance to
issue the SMTP QUIT command. I would think being listed for that a
On Dienstag, 1. Dezember 2009 Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
> So if you have a crappy connection towards your mailserver Marc you
> can get listed, thats rather funny, and annoying. Connections do
> break also when not running a botnet... pfff
>
It's not that you get listed, but all of your cus
Benny Pedersen wrote:
I believe Raymond's response was addressing the fact a server
connection could possibly be interrupted before it had a chance to
issue the SMTP QUIT command. I would think being listed for that alone
would be ridiculous.
if its this i would agree, cant exim see diff in
> On tir 01 dec 2009 02:16:04 CET, wrote
>> I believe Raymond's response was addressing the fact a server
>> connection could possibly be interrupted before it had a chance to
>> issue the SMTP QUIT command. I would think being listed for that alone
>> would be ridiculous.
On 01.12.09 02:20,
On tir 01 dec 2009 02:16:04 CET, wrote
I believe Raymond's response was addressing the fact a server
connection could possibly be interrupted before it had a chance to
issue the SMTP QUIT command. I would think being listed for that
alone would be ridiculous.
if its this i would agree, ca
Quoting Benny Pedersen :
On tir 01 dec 2009 00:51:38 CET, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote
So if you have a crappy connection towards your mailserver Marc you
can get listed, thats rather funny, and annoying. Connections do
break also when not running a botnet... pfff
maybe i am dump, but what
On tir 01 dec 2009 00:51:38 CET, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote
So if you have a crappy connection towards your mailserver Marc you
can get listed, thats rather funny, and annoying. Connections do
break also when not running a botnet... pfff
maybe i am dump, but what do you mean by the above ?
Hi!
I'm investigating it further but what appears is that the IP also
failed to close the connection with a QUIT.
OK, but it really is a legitimate mail server, so shouldn't be listed.
So if you have a crappy connection towards your mailserver Marc you can
get listed, thats rather funny,
On Montag, 30. November 2009 Marc Perkel wrote:
> I'm investigating it further but what appears is that the IP also
> failed to close the connection with a QUIT.
>
OK, but it really is a legitimate mail server, so shouldn't be listed.
mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc- http:
Michael Monnerie wrote:
http://ipadmin.junkemailfilter.com/remove.php?ip=80.245.199.162
I removed that IP now, in order to let pass mail through. But please
check it. It seems you easily blacklist a host that connects to your
tarbaby MX, but we had a network outage on our primary MX which
r
Hi,
> 195.202.149.231 had the same issue. Seems your tarbaby is a bit harsh.
> Looks more like an unhappy woman than a baby ;-)
>
> I've had to drop the use of hostkarma now, way too many FPs.
I've been thinking the same thing for a while, but still have it
enabled and scored low, particularly th
On Montag, 30. November 2009 Michael Monnerie wrote:
> http://ipadmin.junkemailfilter.com/remove.php?ip=80.245.199.162
>
> I removed that IP now, in order to let pass mail through. But please
> check it. It seems you easily blacklist a host that connects to your
> tarbaby MX, but we had a network
30 matches
Mail list logo
