On Montag, 30. November 2009 Alex wrote: > I've been thinking the same thing for a while, but still have it > enabled and scored low, particularly the whitelist. > > How do you think it compares with the Barracuda or Adam Katz lists? > > I have a small script that parses my mail log for JMF_BL, and so far > today on one server it found: > > The rule RCVD_IN_JMF_BL fired 2707 times and tripped 433 times > > I can tell you that there aren't 2707 FPs every day, so it's hitting > quite a bit of ham. Thankfully it's not enough to trigger it to spam.
I don't score on blacklists, I block on SMTP level already. Brutal, but it works. And it means a lot less work for our filters. Therefore, I can't use a blacklist with FPs, as it overloads our support team. Once Marc finds a way to reduce FPs substantially, I'm happy to use it again. mfg zmi -- // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at // Tel: 0660 / 415 6531 .network.your.ideas. // // Wir haben zwei Häuser zu verkaufen: // http://zmi.at/langegg/ // http://willhaben.at/iad/realestate/object?adId=15306857
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
