John Hardin wrote:
I wouldn't recommend doing that for *all* the RBLS, just Zen, and if
you're going to make Zen a poison pill, then just put it into the MTA's
DNSBL list and spare SA the load.
John,
Good suggestion... except that I don't think that Dave is using SA. He
said he uses Smarter
uk1host wrote:
I have moved the weight of the RBLs including Spamcop and Zen to 30.
Hopefully this will cut it back although at the moment I am still getting
mail through.
Dave,
SpamCop and Zen won't block all the spam... but, along the lines of what
I said previously, if this adjustment
On Sat, 2008-03-08 at 09:22 -0800, uk1host wrote:
>
> uk1host wrote:
> >
> >
> > I have moved the weight of the RBLs including Spamcop and Zen to 30.
> >
> > Hopefully this will cut it back although at the moment I am still getting
> > mail through.
I wouldn't recommend doing that for *all* t
uk1host wrote:
>
>
> I have moved the weight of the RBLs including Spamcop and Zen to 30.
>
> Hopefully this will cut it back although at the moment I am still getting
> mail through.
>
> --
> MAIL 1
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: fr
>
> I have moved the weight of the RBLs including Spamcop and Zen to 30.
>
> Hopefully this will cut it back although at the moment I am still getting
> mail through.
>
> --
> MAIL 1
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: from 254.Red-88-12-
On Sat, 2008-03-08 at 16:14, Rob McEwen wrote:
>
> It looks to me like you have some kind of DNS malfunction...or
> SmarterMail malfunction.
>
If you think this may be the case, try using Ethereal/Wireshark while
you run a piece of known spam through a freshly started copy of SA. This
will give a
Dave,
I don't think that you can score Zen too high. I'd bump Zen up to the
highest score and see what happens. If a legit e-mail were to get
blocked by Zen, you'd be able to tell your mail hosting client that the
sender is listed on such a world-famous and reliable blacklist that this
incomi
OOPS...
When I said "PBL and CBL both will cause this to be on XBL and ZEN as well"
I should clarify that:
PBL feeds into ZEN, but not XBL (didn't mean to imply that)
CBL feeds into XBL and ZEN
Nevertheless, since both are in ZEN, this didn't alter my observations
about each message and this
uk1host (Dave) wrote:
(1)
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from Wimax-c3-ppy-pt-190-70-170-132.orbitel.net.co
[190.70.170.132] by mail.uk1host.co.uk with SMTP;
Sat, 8 Mar 2008 08:59:14 -060
190.70.170.132 is currently listed on CBL, SpamCop, and ivmSIP. (XBL and
ZEN would also have
uk1host wrote:
>
>
>
> uk1host wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Rob McEwen wrote:
>>>
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you know if there is a list of RBL's and where I can get it from.
I have a customer who is getting alot of spam and I need to cut it
down alot, he seems to be getting alo
Dave wrote:
I had a auto response
on my mail (which I have now removed) and I was getting 300+ spam over
night.
I have marked it to enable for filtering and enable for incoming blocking is
this correct?
Dave,
First, it is good that you removed the "auto response" because some
argue that
uk1host wrote:
>
>
>
> Rob McEwen wrote:
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Do you know if there is a list of RBL's and where I can get it from.
>>> I have a customer who is getting alot of spam and I need to cut it
>>> down alot, he seems to be getting alot from drug companies and medical
>
Rob McEwen wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Do you know if there is a list of RBL's and where I can get it from.
>> I have a customer who is getting alot of spam and I need to cut it
>> down alot, he seems to be getting alot from drug companies and medical
>> extension companies.
>
> Dav
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you know if there is a list of RBL's and where I can get it from.
I have a customer who is getting alot of spam and I need to cut it
down alot, he seems to be getting alot from drug companies and medical
extension companies.
Dave,
I recommend the following 5 "1st ti
14 matches
Mail list logo
