uk1host wrote:
> 
> 
> I have moved the weight of the RBLs including Spamcop and Zen to 30.
> 
> Hopefully this will cut it back although at the moment I am still getting
> mail through.
> 
> ----------------------------------------------
> MAIL 1
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: from 254.Red-88-12-175.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [88.12.175.254] by
> mail.uk1host.co.uk with SMTP;
>    Sat, 8 Mar 2008 11:12:49 -0600
> Received: from obsidiannowzzz (HELO padrehost.localbayed)
>   by losl7.verne.sd.biz with WQMTP; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 22:02:45 +0600
> Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 13:55:45 -0200
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: "Arline Lam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SPAM] SPAM-HIGH:  incredible prices for best drug$!
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Scanner: vacillate for perilla (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/)
> X-Virus-Scanner: AMaVis 0.2.0-pre6 / Virus Scan
> X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-SmarterMail-Spam: Bayesian Filtering, SpamAssassin 90.25 [raw: 36.1],
> SPF_Fail, ZEN
> X-MSKTag: [SPAM]
> X-MSK: DNS=2
> 
> ------------------
> 
> MAIL 2
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: from adsl-pool2-41.metrotel.net.co [190.182.63.41] by
> mail.uk1host.co.uk with SMTP;
>    Sat, 8 Mar 2008 11:12:44 -0600
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: "Manuela Mainard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [SPAM] SPAM-HIGH:  professor Michael Bugeja
> Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 15:25:12 +0000
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain;
>         charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
> X-SmarterMail-Spam: SpamAssassin 58.75 [raw: 23.5], SPF_None, DNSBL-1,
> HOSTKARMA, SpamCop, ZEN
> X-MSKTag: [SPAM]
> X-MSK: DNS=2
> 
> -----------------
> 
> MAIL 3
> Return-Path: <<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: from u93e4.net.azartsat.pl [82.177.216.93] by mail.uk1host.co.uk
> with SMTP;
>    Sat, 8 Mar 2008 11:11:30 -0600
> Received: (from Latasha [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>         by Latasha Petersen.net MqFx id g42Ls1T27291;
>         Sat, 08 Mar 2008 09:54:25 -0600
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: "Latasha Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
> Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 09:52:25 -0600
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SPAM] SPAM-HIGH:  Apcal~is (Tadalafil)--The "S.u.p.e.r
> V.i.a.g.r.a" hkoprigmo -electrophoresis
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-SmarterMail-Spam: Bayesian Filtering, SpamAssassin 52.25 [raw: 20.9],
> SPF_None
> X-MSKTag: [SPAM]
> X-MSK: DNS=2
> 
> Cheers
> Dave
> =====================================================
> 
> 



Rob McEwen wrote:
> 
> OOPS...
> 
> When I said "PBL and CBL both will cause this to be on XBL and ZEN as
> well"
> 
> I should clarify that:
> 
> PBL feeds into ZEN, but not XBL (didn't mean to imply that)
> 
> CBL feeds into XBL and ZEN
> 
> Nevertheless, since both are in ZEN, this didn't alter my observations 
> about each message and this didn't change my conclusions.
> 
> --Rob McEwen
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Domain-Name-SPAM-tp15891193p15917313.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to