Re: Digest::SHA1 module is required by the Razor2 plugin

2016-09-21 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 21.09.2016 um 23:36 schrieb RW: On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:54:32 +0200 li...@rhsoft.net wrote: surely - while DCC ist not a spam sign by it's descriptions razor/pyzor *are* and they have nothing in common with DNSBL/URIBL they are *content digest* Actually razor is pretty close to a URIBL, n

Re: Digest::SHA1 module is required by the Razor2 plugin

2016-09-21 Thread RW
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:54:32 +0200 li...@rhsoft.net wrote: > Am 21.09.2016 um 10:18 schrieb Marcus Schopen: > > Am Montag, den 19.09.2016, 13:35 +0100 schrieb RW: > It's not a spamassassin problem, right. Question is, can I > install a SHA1 package without harming perl at other places?

Re: Digest::SHA1 module is required by the Razor2 plugin

2016-09-21 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 21.09.2016 um 10:18 schrieb Marcus Schopen: Am Montag, den 19.09.2016, 13:35 +0100 schrieb RW: It's not a spamassassin problem, right. Question is, can I install a SHA1 package without harming perl at other places? It should do any harm. That should have been: It shouldn't do any harm.

Re: Digest::SHA1 module is required by the Razor2 plugin

2016-09-21 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Am Montag, den 19.09.2016, 13:35 +0100 schrieb RW: > > It's not a spamassassin problem, right. Question is, can I install a > > SHA1 package without harming perl at other places? > > It should do any harm. That should have been: It shouldn't do any harm. On 21.09.16 10:18, Marcus Schopen wrot

Re: Digest::SHA1 module is required by the Razor2 plugin

2016-09-21 Thread Marcus Schopen
Hi, Am Montag, den 19.09.2016, 13:35 +0100 schrieb RW: > > > It's not a spamassassin problem, right. Question is, can I install a > > > SHA1 package without harming perl at other places? > > > > It should do any harm. > > That should have been: > > It shouldn't do any harm. Thanks. Build a b

Re: Digest::SHA1 module is required by the Razor2 plugin

2016-09-19 Thread RW
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 13:33:59 +0100 RW wrote: > On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 14:05:34 +0200 > Marcus Schopen wrote: > > > Am Montag, den 19.09.2016, 11:37 +0200 schrieb li...@rhsoft.net: > > > Am 19.09.2016 um 11:10 schrieb Marcus Schopen: > > > > I'd like to use razor on my private mailbox, but it s

Re: Digest::SHA1 module is required by the Razor2 plugin

2016-09-19 Thread RW
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 14:05:34 +0200 Marcus Schopen wrote: > Am Montag, den 19.09.2016, 11:37 +0200 schrieb li...@rhsoft.net: > > Am 19.09.2016 um 11:10 schrieb Marcus Schopen: > > > I'd like to use razor on my private mailbox, but it seems to > > > depend on Digest::SHA1, which is not part of Ubu

Re: Digest::SHA1 module is required by the Razor2 plugin

2016-09-19 Thread Marcus Schopen
Am Montag, den 19.09.2016, 11:37 +0200 schrieb li...@rhsoft.net: > Am 19.09.2016 um 11:10 schrieb Marcus Schopen: > > I'd like to use razor on my private mailbox, but it seems to depend on > > Digest::SHA1, which is not part of Ubuntu 12.04 LTS or 14.04 TLS: > > > > The Digest::SHA1 module is requ

Re: Digest::SHA1 module is required by the Razor2 plugin

2016-09-19 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 19.09.2016 um 11:10 schrieb Marcus Schopen: I'd like to use razor on my private mailbox, but it seems to depend on Digest::SHA1, which is not part of Ubuntu 12.04 LTS or 14.04 TLS: The Digest::SHA1 module is required by the Razor2 plugin I found this bug report https://bugs.launchpad.net/