On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:54:32 +0200 li...@rhsoft.net wrote: > Am 21.09.2016 um 10:18 schrieb Marcus Schopen: > > Am Montag, den 19.09.2016, 13:35 +0100 schrieb RW: > >>>> It's not a spamassassin problem, right. Question is, can I > >>>> install a SHA1 package without harming perl at other places? > >>> > >>> It should do any harm. > >> > >> That should have been: > >> > >> It shouldn't do any harm. > > > > Thanks. Build a backport and razor is running fine now. > > > > Is anyone using razor/pyzor/DCC and can give some efficiency > > report? Do they still make sense beside DNSBL and URIBL? > > surely - while DCC ist not a spam sign by it's descriptions > razor/pyzor *are* and they have nothing in common with DNSBL/URIBL > > they are *content digest*
Actually razor is pretty close to a URIBL, now that only engine 8 is supported by Cloudmark. It's based on a combination of URI domain name and text size, so you only get a hit if a domain has been reported inside a similarly sized mime section.
