On 10.09.08 11:24, PileOfMush wrote:
> No, I ran the spamassassin -d -t test as root. I'm not sure which user to
> run as. I'm using qmail on plesk. I have about 6 different users with
> the name "qmail" in them, plus a few "mail" related users as well as
> "popuser".
>
> Here is what's differen
PileOfMush wrote:
> No, I ran the spamassassin -d -t test as root.
Well, if you use spamd, that's definitely not the right user. Spamd will
never scan as root.
> I'm not sure which user to
> run as. I'm using qmail on plesk. I have about 6 different users with
> the name "qmail" in them, plus
No, I ran the spamassassin -d -t test as root. I'm not sure which user to
run as. I'm using qmail on plesk. I have about 6 different users with
the name "qmail" in them, plus a few "mail" related users as well as
"popuser".
Here is what's different between the two sets of headers. I threw the B
PileOfMush wrote:
> Can someone help me understand why a message can come through and get
> one score, then I can scan it again 1 minute later and get a much
> higher score? Here's the message. http://slexy.org/raw/s2JoVC8OlP The
> top copy of the message was how it was scanned coming in. Immediate
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, PileOfMush wrote:
Can someone help me understand why a message can come through and get one
score, then I can scan it again 1 minute later and get a
much higher score? Here's the message. http://slexy.org/raw/s2JoVC8OlP The top
copy of the message was how it was scanned com
On 28.07.08 14:44, maillist wrote:
>I am getting a lot of spam. I did some investigating, and it looks
> like I have something set up incorrectly. If I get a spam message, and
> run it through "spamassassin -t", then it shows that it should be spam,
> but during the process when the mail a
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 19:15 -0500, maillist wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> >
> > RBL hits. They most likely have been updated since the original scan.
> > Since you get this result with a subsequent spamc run, too, we pretty
> > much can rule out permanent DNS failures or local tests option.
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
RBL hits. They most likely have been updated since the original scan.
Since you get this result with a subsequent spamc run, too, we pretty
much can rule out permanent DNS failures or local tests option. Still, a
(potentially local) temporary DNS issue might explain it
> The test score for that message was 6.269 ( 7 is required ) and the
^
> tests that it hit were:
> BAYES_80,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,HS_BOBAX_MID_2,RDNS_NONE
> ...however, when I manually run it through either spamc -c < 7.txt or
> spamassass
> Another responded with a request for more info. I posted one small
> message here...
That would have been me. ;)
> http://emailacs.com/temp/J872209005Tq/7.txt
>
> The test score for that message was 6.269 ( 7 is required ) and the
> tests that it hit were:
> BAYES_80,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,HS_
Bowie Bailey wrote:
maillist wrote:
Hi guys,
slackware 11.0
spamassassin version 3.2.5
running on Perl version 5.8.8
mimedefang version 2.64
sendmail 8.14
I am getting a lot of spam. I did some investigating, and it
looks like I have something set up incorrectly. If I get a spam
mes
> I am getting a lot of spam. I did some investigating, and it looks
> like I have something set up incorrectly. If I get a spam message, and
> run it through "spamassassin -t", then it shows that it should be spam,
> but during the process when the mail actually comes in, it is scoring
maillist wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> slackware 11.0
> spamassassin version 3.2.5
> running on Perl version 5.8.8
> mimedefang version 2.64
> sendmail 8.14
>
> I am getting a lot of spam. I did some investigating, and it
> looks like I have something set up incorrectly. If I get a spam
> message
Joeri Belis wrote:
> setup :
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ spamc -V
> SpamAssassin Client version 3.1.7
> compiled with SSL support (OpenSSL 0.9.8c 05 Sep 2006)
>
> i get totaly different scores when i run spamc from the commandline as
> vpopmail user as when i run i from procmail also as vpopmail us
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 05:02:28PM +0200, Joeri Belis wrote:
> run from cmd line as vpopmail user
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.2 required=3.4 tests=ADVANCE_FEE_1,ADVANCE_FEE_2,
>BAYES_00,MISSING_HB_SEP,MISSING_SUBJECT,NO_RECEIVED,NO_RELAYS,
>TO_CC_NONE autolearn=no version=3.1.7
Ev
Kelsey Forsythe wrote:
> I am running SpamAssassin version 3.0.1 running on Perl version 5.8.6
> on an Xserve G5.
> When I try to test the spamassassin execution using 'spamassassin -tD
> < [test message]'
> I receive the following:
>
> I type 'spamassassin -tD < 16146.'
> and a bunch of debug resu
Chad -
I only just glanced at your message, but I think you must be looking at
2 different messages, OR your spamd start is manually setting a config
that is different than the default set picked up by spamassassin, which
doesn't pick up on that. It's likely if you start spamd without the
extr
At 07:23 AM 11/11/2004 -0500, Chad M Stewart wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22). SA is running on an OpenBSD
3.5 i386 machine. I'm starting it up using the following
/usr/local/bin/spamd -u spamd -a --allowed-ips=192.168.1.0/24
--siteconfigpath=/etc/mail/spamassassin/ -d --li
On Thursday 11 November 2004 04:23 am, Chad M Stewart wrote:
> Something else is going wrong with my Bayes db learning as well. I
> restarted spamd this morning. By restart I mean I found the running
> process ID, sent it a kill -TERM and then started it again using the
> above string. Bef
19 matches
Mail list logo
