On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 19:15 -0500, maillist wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> >
> > RBL hits. They most likely have been updated since the original scan.
> > Since you get this result with a subsequent spamc run, too, we pretty
> > much can rule out permanent DNS failures or local tests option. Still, a
> > (potentially local) temporary DNS issue might explain it.
>
> I feel like a complete ass. After reading this, I remembered that once
> I suspected that the DNS queries were taking to long, and decided to do
> some testing, so I turned off the RBL checks, but I did this in
> mimedefang's config file. I re-enabled it, and will probably find that
> my problem is gone now.
Oh, right. Actually, my above judgment could have been more accurate,
too. ;) I noticed the headers are not inserted by SA, when I mentioned
that auto-learn info is missing. That could have tipped me off to not
rule out local test mode only.
> As always, many thanks for this group, and all it's help
Glad to see all my remarks made you spot the issue and see the problem,
if not nail the problem right away myself. :)
guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
