On 17.08.09 20:33, Matt Kettler wrote:
> You can also set your min_cf in your razor config files, which will
> affect when the RAZOR2_CHECK rule fires. This does work in SpamAssassin,
> as I have over-ridden the min_cf on my own system, and have done so for
> years.
> > On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 09:52
Hi,
> You can also set your min_cf in your razor config files, which will
> affect when the RAZOR2_CHECK rule fires. This does work in SpamAssassin,
> as I have over-ridden the min_cf on my own system, and have done so for
> years.
Thanks to everyone for their great ideas thus far. I'm looking fo
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 09:52 +0200, Matus UHLAR wrote:
>
>> On 15.08.09 14:32, Matt Kettler wrote:
>>
>>> That means it was found and was above your min_cf. i.e.: Razor believes
>>> it is spam.
>>>
>> There's no min_cf gor RAZOR and there's no public hitco
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 09:52 +0200, Matus UHLAR wrote:
> On 15.08.09 14:32, Matt Kettler wrote:
> > That means it was found and was above your min_cf. i.e.: Razor believes
> > it is spam.
>
> There's no min_cf gor RAZOR and there's no public hitcount. RAZOR2 has
> internal trust system which counts
> MySQL Student wrote:
> > I thought "grep -c RAZOR2_CHECK" through my mail logs would give me a
> > good approximation of the number of times RAZOR2 was consulted, but
> > that doesn't seem to be the case. There are some mails that don't have
> > it listed in the "tests=" section.
> >
> > I've als
MySQL Student wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I thought "grep -c RAZOR2_CHECK" through my mail logs would give me a
> good approximation of the number of times RAZOR2 was consulted, but
> that doesn't seem to be the case. There are some mails that don't have
> it listed in the "tests=" section.
>
> I've also trie
